Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review.

Andres Laserna, John A Cuenca, Peyton Martin, Cosmo Fowler, Julian Barahona-Correa, Nirmala Manjappachar, Clara Fowler, Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Marcio Borges, Charles L Sprung, Joseph L Nates
{"title":"Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review.","authors":"Andres Laserna, John A Cuenca, Peyton Martin, Cosmo Fowler, Julian Barahona-Correa, Nirmala Manjappachar, Clara Fowler, Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Marcio Borges, Charles L Sprung, Joseph L Nates","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to delineate the mortality outcome time frames reported in septic shock randomized control trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Studies that included adult patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Any type of intervention.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Information about the study, specific patient population, type of study intervention, specific intervention, and number of patients. Mortality time frames were analyzed for geographical differences and changes over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 2660 unique citations. After screening, 132 eligible studies were identified. A total of 234 mortality time frames were collected from the included studies, of which 15 timeframes were unique. The most frequently reported time frame was 28-day mortality (n = 98, 74% of trials), followed by hospital mortality (n = 35, 27%), ICU mortality (n = 30, 23%), and 90-day mortality (n = 29, 22%). The most reported mortality time frame was 28 days in studies from every continent except Africa. The studies published between 2008 and 2013 (25%) more frequently reported hospital and ICU mortality combination than studies published between 2014 and 2019 (11.4%) (P = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was considerable variability in the mortality time frames reported in ICU-based septic shock trials. This variability may lead to under or overestimation of the problem, overlooking the effectiveness of the interventions studied, and further limiting the application of trials and their pooling in meta-analyses. A consensus regarding time frame reporting in septic shock trials is long overdue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We sought to delineate the mortality outcome time frames reported in septic shock randomized control trials (RCTs).

Design: Systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Setting: Intensive care units.

Participants: Studies that included adult patients with septic shock.

Interventions: Any type of intervention.

Main variables of interest: Information about the study, specific patient population, type of study intervention, specific intervention, and number of patients. Mortality time frames were analyzed for geographical differences and changes over time.

Results: The search yielded 2660 unique citations. After screening, 132 eligible studies were identified. A total of 234 mortality time frames were collected from the included studies, of which 15 timeframes were unique. The most frequently reported time frame was 28-day mortality (n = 98, 74% of trials), followed by hospital mortality (n = 35, 27%), ICU mortality (n = 30, 23%), and 90-day mortality (n = 29, 22%). The most reported mortality time frame was 28 days in studies from every continent except Africa. The studies published between 2008 and 2013 (25%) more frequently reported hospital and ICU mortality combination than studies published between 2014 and 2019 (11.4%) (P = 0.043).

Conclusions: There was considerable variability in the mortality time frames reported in ICU-based septic shock trials. This variability may lead to under or overestimation of the problem, overlooking the effectiveness of the interventions studied, and further limiting the application of trials and their pooling in meta-analyses. A consensus regarding time frame reporting in septic shock trials is long overdue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review. The role of static elastic power in the severity and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Exploring volatile anesthetics in critical care: Facts and uncertainties. Effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation in critical patients with acute respiratory failure and do not intubate order. Does early surfactant improve outcome in late preterm newborn? Retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1