Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review

Medicina intensiva Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.medine.2025.502172
Andres Laserna , John A. Cuenca , Peyton Martin , Cosmo Fowler , Julian Barahona-Correa , Nirmala Manjappachar , Clara Fowler , Maria A. Lopez-Olivo , Marcio Borges , Charles L. Sprung , Joseph L. Nates
{"title":"Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review","authors":"Andres Laserna ,&nbsp;John A. Cuenca ,&nbsp;Peyton Martin ,&nbsp;Cosmo Fowler ,&nbsp;Julian Barahona-Correa ,&nbsp;Nirmala Manjappachar ,&nbsp;Clara Fowler ,&nbsp;Maria A. Lopez-Olivo ,&nbsp;Marcio Borges ,&nbsp;Charles L. Sprung ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Nates","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>We sought to delineate the mortality outcome time frames reported in septic shock </span>randomized control trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive care units.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Studies that included adult patients with septic shock.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Any type of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>Information about the study, specific patient population, type of study intervention, specific intervention, and number of patients. Mortality time frames were analyzed for geographical differences and changes over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 2660 unique citations. After screening, 132 eligible studies were identified. A total of 234 mortality time frames were collected from the included studies, of which 15 timeframes were unique. The most frequently reported time frame was 28-day mortality (n = 98, 74% of trials), followed by hospital mortality (n = 35, 27%), ICU mortality (n = 30, 23%), and 90-day mortality (n = 29, 22%). The most reported mortality time frame was 28 days in studies from every continent except Africa. The studies published between 2008 and 2013 (25%) more frequently reported hospital and ICU mortality combination than studies published between 2014 and 2019 (11.4%) (<em>P</em> = 0.043).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was considerable variability in the mortality time frames reported in ICU-based septic shock trials. This variability may lead to under or overestimation of the problem, overlooking the effectiveness of the interventions studied, and further limiting the application of trials and their pooling in meta-analyses. A consensus regarding time frame reporting in septic shock trials is long overdue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 502172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572725000505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We sought to delineate the mortality outcome time frames reported in septic shock randomized control trials (RCTs).

Design

Systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Setting

Intensive care units.

Participants

Studies that included adult patients with septic shock.

Interventions

Any type of intervention.

Main variables of interest

Information about the study, specific patient population, type of study intervention, specific intervention, and number of patients. Mortality time frames were analyzed for geographical differences and changes over time.

Results

The search yielded 2660 unique citations. After screening, 132 eligible studies were identified. A total of 234 mortality time frames were collected from the included studies, of which 15 timeframes were unique. The most frequently reported time frame was 28-day mortality (n = 98, 74% of trials), followed by hospital mortality (n = 35, 27%), ICU mortality (n = 30, 23%), and 90-day mortality (n = 29, 22%). The most reported mortality time frame was 28 days in studies from every continent except Africa. The studies published between 2008 and 2013 (25%) more frequently reported hospital and ICU mortality combination than studies published between 2014 and 2019 (11.4%) (P = 0.043).

Conclusions

There was considerable variability in the mortality time frames reported in ICU-based septic shock trials. This variability may lead to under or overestimation of the problem, overlooking the effectiveness of the interventions studied, and further limiting the application of trials and their pooling in meta-analyses. A consensus regarding time frame reporting in septic shock trials is long overdue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感染性休克临床试验的死亡率时间框架可变性:一项系统综述。
目的:我们试图描述脓毒性休克随机对照试验(rct)报告的死亡率结局时间框架。设计:对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库进行系统评价。环境:重症监护病房。研究对象:包括感染性休克的成年患者。干预:任何类型的干预。感兴趣的主要变量:研究信息、特定患者群体、研究干预类型、特定干预和患者数量。分析了死亡率时间框架的地理差异和随时间的变化。结果:搜索产生了2660个独特的引用。筛选后,确定了132项符合条件的研究。从纳入的研究中共收集了234个死亡率时间框架,其中15个时间框架是独特的。最常报告的时间范围是28天死亡率(n = 98,74%的试验),其次是住院死亡率(n = 34,27%)、ICU死亡率(n = 30,23%)和90天死亡率(n = 29,22%)。在除非洲以外的各大洲的研究中,报告最多的死亡率时限为28天。2008年至2013年发表的研究(25%)报告的医院和ICU合并死亡率高于2014年至2019年发表的研究(11.4%)(P = 0.043)。结论:在基于重症监护病房的脓毒性休克试验中,死亡率时间框架存在相当大的差异。这种可变性可能导致对问题的低估或高估,忽视了所研究干预措施的有效性,并进一步限制了试验的应用及其在荟萃分析中的汇集。关于脓毒性休克试验报告的时间框架的共识是早就应该达成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The therapeutic context as a determinant of prognosis in critically ill cancer patients. Prediction of COVID-19 mortality using machine learning strategies and a large-scale panel of plasma inflammatory proteins: A cohort study 0.9% sodium chloride versus ringer’s lactate in the management of severe diabetic ketoacidosis: A randomized trial Key laboratory changes in severe trauma, a different pattern for each clinical phenotype Usefulness of vector velocity imaging in the descending thoracic aorta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1