Are gaseous nitrogen losses affected by the fertilizer type and rate in maize?

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2025.106519
Sergio Tovar Hernández , Fernando Salvagiotti , Nuria Lewczuk , Walter Carciochi , Keren Hernandez Guijarro , Micaela Biassoni , Esteban Kehoe , Oscar Avila , Gisela Garcia , Mirta Toribio , Fernando García , Hernan Sainz Rozas , Nahuel Reussi Calvo
{"title":"Are gaseous nitrogen losses affected by the fertilizer type and rate in maize?","authors":"Sergio Tovar Hernández ,&nbsp;Fernando Salvagiotti ,&nbsp;Nuria Lewczuk ,&nbsp;Walter Carciochi ,&nbsp;Keren Hernandez Guijarro ,&nbsp;Micaela Biassoni ,&nbsp;Esteban Kehoe ,&nbsp;Oscar Avila ,&nbsp;Gisela Garcia ,&nbsp;Mirta Toribio ,&nbsp;Fernando García ,&nbsp;Hernan Sainz Rozas ,&nbsp;Nahuel Reussi Calvo","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nitrogen (N) management practices have the potential to reduce nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization while enhancing maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) productivity. However, the specific effect of N rate and source remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate, during the maize growing season, the effect of both N rate and source on <em>i</em>) gaseous losses through NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and <em>ii</em>) agronomic traits such as grain yield and N uptake (N<sub>upt</sub>). Four experiments were conducted in the humid temperate region of Argentina between 2020 and 2022. Treatments consisted of four N rates, between 0 and 200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> combined with four N sources [urea, urea with urease inhibitor (U<sub>UI</sub>), urea with nitrification inhibitor (U<sub>NI</sub>), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)]. We observed a significant response to N fertilization on grain yield with increases from 20 % to 64 %. However, no differences between N sources were determined. CAN presented the greatest N<sub>upt</sub>, which was up to 27 % higher than urea-based N sources. NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization was the major N loss process with urea exhibiting the highest values. U<sub>UI</sub> and CAN significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in comparison to urea. CAN showed the highest N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, losing up to 1.5 % of the applied N. U<sub>NI</sub> significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 50 %. Emission factors for both NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O were consistently lower than the default values suggested by the IPCC guidelines. In conclusion, N sources such as U<sub>UI</sub> and U<sub>NI</sub> lead to achieve high grain yields with a low environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106519"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500073X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) management practices have the potential to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and ammonia (NH3) volatilization while enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) productivity. However, the specific effect of N rate and source remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate, during the maize growing season, the effect of both N rate and source on i) gaseous losses through NH3 volatilization and N2O emissions and ii) agronomic traits such as grain yield and N uptake (Nupt). Four experiments were conducted in the humid temperate region of Argentina between 2020 and 2022. Treatments consisted of four N rates, between 0 and 200 kg N ha−1 combined with four N sources [urea, urea with urease inhibitor (UUI), urea with nitrification inhibitor (UNI), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)]. We observed a significant response to N fertilization on grain yield with increases from 20 % to 64 %. However, no differences between N sources were determined. CAN presented the greatest Nupt, which was up to 27 % higher than urea-based N sources. NH3 volatilization was the major N loss process with urea exhibiting the highest values. UUI and CAN significantly reduced NH3 volatilization in comparison to urea. CAN showed the highest N2O emissions, losing up to 1.5 % of the applied N. UNI significantly reduced N2O emissions by 50 %. Emission factors for both NH3 and N2O were consistently lower than the default values suggested by the IPCC guidelines. In conclusion, N sources such as UUI and UNI lead to achieve high grain yields with a low environmental impact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of different VisNIR and MIR spectroscopic techniques and the potential of calibration transfer between MIR laboratory and portable instruments to estimate soil properties Are gaseous nitrogen losses affected by the fertilizer type and rate in maize? A two-stage algorithm for regional-scale SOC prediction: Eliminating the spatial scale effect between multi-source remote sensing data Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer application enhanced sugar beet productivity and socio-ecological benefits in China: A meta-analysis Root plasticity improves the potential of maize/soybean intercropping to stabilize the yield
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1