PoliGuilt: Two level guilt detection from social media texts

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems with Applications Pub Date : 2025-06-05 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127187
Abdul Gafar Manuel Meque, Fazlourrahman Balouchzahi, Alexander Gelbukh, Grigori Sidorov
{"title":"PoliGuilt: Two level guilt detection from social media texts","authors":"Abdul Gafar Manuel Meque,&nbsp;Fazlourrahman Balouchzahi,&nbsp;Alexander Gelbukh,&nbsp;Grigori Sidorov","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Guilt, a multifaceted emotion stemming from the realization of causing harm, intertwines with various aspects of human psychology and social interaction. This paper delves into the nature of guilt by developing an annotated dataset of 3,304 posts. Guilt detection is approached as a two-level classification task: first, distinguishing between guilt and non-guilt, and then categorizing guilt into the types “Anticipatory”, “Reactive”, and “Existential” based on psychological frameworks. Exploratory analyses are conducted to examine the contributions of post titles, self-text, and their combination as inputs to guilt detection algorithms. Various learning approaches were employed, including traditional machine learning, deep learning models, and transformers, to ensure quality and efficacy. The findings indicate that while simple methods using only unigrams can distinguish between texts expressing guilt and those that do not, they struggle with fine-grained categorization of guilt types. Additionally, deep learning models and transformers, especially when utilizing contextual information from longer texts and a combination of titles and self-texts, show greater success in capturing the context of the text. Notably, the RoBERTa-base model achieved average F1 scores of 0.7599 for binary classification and 0.7394 for multiclass classification, outperforming all other experiments when combining the title and self-text.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 127187"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425008097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guilt, a multifaceted emotion stemming from the realization of causing harm, intertwines with various aspects of human psychology and social interaction. This paper delves into the nature of guilt by developing an annotated dataset of 3,304 posts. Guilt detection is approached as a two-level classification task: first, distinguishing between guilt and non-guilt, and then categorizing guilt into the types “Anticipatory”, “Reactive”, and “Existential” based on psychological frameworks. Exploratory analyses are conducted to examine the contributions of post titles, self-text, and their combination as inputs to guilt detection algorithms. Various learning approaches were employed, including traditional machine learning, deep learning models, and transformers, to ensure quality and efficacy. The findings indicate that while simple methods using only unigrams can distinguish between texts expressing guilt and those that do not, they struggle with fine-grained categorization of guilt types. Additionally, deep learning models and transformers, especially when utilizing contextual information from longer texts and a combination of titles and self-texts, show greater success in capturing the context of the text. Notably, the RoBERTa-base model achieved average F1 scores of 0.7599 for binary classification and 0.7394 for multiclass classification, outperforming all other experiments when combining the title and self-text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体文本的两级内疚感检测
内疚是一种因意识到造成伤害而产生的多方面情感,它与人类心理和社会交往的各个方面交织在一起。本文通过开发一个包含3304个帖子的注释数据集来深入研究内疚的本质。内疚检测是一个两级分类任务:首先,区分内疚和非内疚,然后根据心理框架将内疚分为“预期”、“反应”和“存在”类型。进行探索性分析,以检查帖子标题,自文本,以及它们的组合作为输入有罪检测算法的贡献。采用了各种学习方法,包括传统的机器学习、深度学习模型和变压器,以确保质量和效果。研究结果表明,虽然仅使用单字的简单方法可以区分表达内疚的文本和不表达内疚的文本,但它们很难对内疚类型进行细粒度分类。此外,深度学习模型和转换器,特别是在利用来自较长文本的上下文信息以及标题和自文本的组合时,在捕获文本上下文方面取得了更大的成功。值得注意的是,RoBERTa-base模型在二元分类和多类分类中分别获得了0.7599和0.7394的平均F1分数,在结合标题和自文本时优于所有其他实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
期刊最新文献
SCSMamba: Spatial-channel sparse Mamba for event-based object detection SCIA-GAN: Robust image watermarking via spatial-channel interaction attention and feature preservation AMIS-DynaFlow: a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning framework with quantum-inspired operators for real-time patient flow optimization in oncology centers Context-fused emotional flow modeling for dynamic affective recognition in dialogue interactions MCMamba: A multi-scale correlation-aware model with Mamba for stock price forecasting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1