N. Harbeck , V. Dieras , K.A. Gelmon , R.S. Finn , M. Martin , P. Neven , S. Kim , J. Ma , E. Gauthier , E. Broughton , J. Doan , H.S. Rugo
{"title":"Effect of palbociclib plus letrozole on patient-reported health-related quality of life: extended follow-up of the PALOMA-2 trial","authors":"N. Harbeck , V. Dieras , K.A. Gelmon , R.S. Finn , M. Martin , P. Neven , S. Kim , J. Ma , E. Gauthier , E. Broughton , J. Doan , H.S. Rugo","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable, highlighting the importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in treatment decision making. In the randomized phase III PALOMA-2 trial, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was maintained in patients receiving first-line palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole after a median follow-up of 22.3 months. However, little is known about HRQoL for patients taking palbociclib for an extended period of time. Here, we report the PRO results from the PALOMA-2 trial after a median follow-up time of 90 months.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Women with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2−) mBC were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to receive palbociclib plus letrozole (<em>n</em> = 444) or placebo plus letrozole (<em>n</em> = 222). HRQoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQoL five-dimensions three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires, administered on site on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3 and then every other cycle from cycle 5 until study end. Treatment arm comparisons were made for change from baseline in QoL and time to deterioration in FACT-B (definitive definition, TTDD).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After a median follow-up of 90 months, no significant differences between treatments were observed for overall change from baseline in FACT-B total, FACT-B subscales, and EQ-5D-3L scores. While TTDD did not differ between treatment arms, TTDD was shorter for patients with disease progression versus those without disease progression (hazard ratio 0.644, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Individual items assessing side-effects and hair loss favored the palbociclib plus letrozole arm versus the letrozole arm; no treatment difference was observed for items assessing pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This extended follow-up analysis of PROs in PALOMA-2 shows continued QoL maintenance for patients with ER+/HER2− mBC receiving long-term palbociclib plus letrozole treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 104497"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925003667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable, highlighting the importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in treatment decision making. In the randomized phase III PALOMA-2 trial, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was maintained in patients receiving first-line palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole after a median follow-up of 22.3 months. However, little is known about HRQoL for patients taking palbociclib for an extended period of time. Here, we report the PRO results from the PALOMA-2 trial after a median follow-up time of 90 months.
Patients and methods
Women with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2−) mBC were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to receive palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 444) or placebo plus letrozole (n = 222). HRQoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQoL five-dimensions three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires, administered on site on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3 and then every other cycle from cycle 5 until study end. Treatment arm comparisons were made for change from baseline in QoL and time to deterioration in FACT-B (definitive definition, TTDD).
Results
After a median follow-up of 90 months, no significant differences between treatments were observed for overall change from baseline in FACT-B total, FACT-B subscales, and EQ-5D-3L scores. While TTDD did not differ between treatment arms, TTDD was shorter for patients with disease progression versus those without disease progression (hazard ratio 0.644, P < 0.001). Individual items assessing side-effects and hair loss favored the palbociclib plus letrozole arm versus the letrozole arm; no treatment difference was observed for items assessing pain.
Conclusions
This extended follow-up analysis of PROs in PALOMA-2 shows continued QoL maintenance for patients with ER+/HER2− mBC receiving long-term palbociclib plus letrozole treatment.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.