K. Csende , B. Ferencz , K. Boettiger , M.D. Pozonec , A. Lantos , A. Ferenczy , O. Pipek , A. Solta , B. Ernhofer , V. Laszlo , E. Megyesfalvi , K. Schelch , V. Pozonec , J. Skarda , V. Skopelidou , Z. Lohinai , C. Lang , L. Horvath , K. Dezso , J. Fillinger , Z. Megyesfalvi
{"title":"Comparative profiling of surgically resected primary tumors and their lymph node metastases in small-cell lung cancer","authors":"K. Csende , B. Ferencz , K. Boettiger , M.D. Pozonec , A. Lantos , A. Ferenczy , O. Pipek , A. Solta , B. Ernhofer , V. Laszlo , E. Megyesfalvi , K. Schelch , V. Pozonec , J. Skarda , V. Skopelidou , Z. Lohinai , C. Lang , L. Horvath , K. Dezso , J. Fillinger , Z. Megyesfalvi","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Profiling studies in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have mainly focused on primary tumors, omitting the potential molecular changes that might occur during lymphatic metastasis formation. Here, we assessed the molecular discordance between primary SCLCs and corresponding lymph node (LN) metastases in the light of subtype distribution and expression of clinically relevant proteins.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comparative profiling of 32 surgically resected primary SCLCs and their LN metastases was achieved by RNA expression analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In addition to subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1), the expression of nine cancer-specific proteins was evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The selected clinically relevant molecules showed no significant differences in their RNA expression profile when assessing the primary tumors and their corresponding LN metastases. Nevertheless, IHC analyses revealed significantly higher DLL3 expression in the primary tumors than in the LN metastases (<em>P</em> = 0.008). In contrast, NEUROD1 expression was significantly lower in the primary tumors (versus LN metastases, <em>P</em> < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found by IHC analysis in the case of other clinically relevant proteins. Concerning SCLC molecular subtypes, a change in subtype distribution was detected in 21 cases. Phenotype switching from neuroendocrine (NE) subtypes toward non-NE lesions and from non-NE landscape toward NE subtypes were both detected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the molecular landscape of SCLC LN metastases largely resembles that of the tumor of origin, key differences exist in terms of DLL3 and NEUROD1 expression, and in subtype distribution. These diagnostic pitfalls should be considered when establishing the tumors’ molecular profile for future clinical trials solely based on LN biopsies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 104514"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925003837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Profiling studies in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have mainly focused on primary tumors, omitting the potential molecular changes that might occur during lymphatic metastasis formation. Here, we assessed the molecular discordance between primary SCLCs and corresponding lymph node (LN) metastases in the light of subtype distribution and expression of clinically relevant proteins.
Methods
Comparative profiling of 32 surgically resected primary SCLCs and their LN metastases was achieved by RNA expression analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In addition to subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1), the expression of nine cancer-specific proteins was evaluated.
Results
The selected clinically relevant molecules showed no significant differences in their RNA expression profile when assessing the primary tumors and their corresponding LN metastases. Nevertheless, IHC analyses revealed significantly higher DLL3 expression in the primary tumors than in the LN metastases (P = 0.008). In contrast, NEUROD1 expression was significantly lower in the primary tumors (versus LN metastases, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found by IHC analysis in the case of other clinically relevant proteins. Concerning SCLC molecular subtypes, a change in subtype distribution was detected in 21 cases. Phenotype switching from neuroendocrine (NE) subtypes toward non-NE lesions and from non-NE landscape toward NE subtypes were both detected.
Conclusions
Although the molecular landscape of SCLC LN metastases largely resembles that of the tumor of origin, key differences exist in terms of DLL3 and NEUROD1 expression, and in subtype distribution. These diagnostic pitfalls should be considered when establishing the tumors’ molecular profile for future clinical trials solely based on LN biopsies.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.