Ekaterina Botchkovar , Kexin Cui , Olena Antonaccio , Robert Perkins , David Maimon
{"title":"The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach","authors":"Ekaterina Botchkovar , Kexin Cui , Olena Antonaccio , Robert Perkins , David Maimon","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network \"hubs\" or \"brokers\" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102873"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network "hubs" or "brokers" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.