The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102873
Ekaterina Botchkovar , Kexin Cui , Olena Antonaccio , Robert Perkins , David Maimon
{"title":"The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach","authors":"Ekaterina Botchkovar ,&nbsp;Kexin Cui ,&nbsp;Olena Antonaccio ,&nbsp;Robert Perkins ,&nbsp;David Maimon","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network \"hubs\" or \"brokers\" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102873"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network "hubs" or "brokers" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
Can artificial intelligence contribute to the new energy system? Based on the perspective of labor supply The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach The effects of employees' digital growth mindset and supervisors’ coaching behaviour on digital self-efficacy Factors affecting the inference of manipulative intent in influencer marketing Immersive learning in virtual worlds: A two-step analysis SEM and NCA for assessing the impact of Metaverse education on knowledge retention and student collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1