Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi muscle flaps as a reliable technique for breast reconstruction in underweight patients: A bicentric retrospective case-control study

Koichi Tomita , Mifue Taminato , Yoshihito Itani , Hirohisa Kusuhara , Hitomi Nakao , Yu Sueyoshi , Tateki Kubo
{"title":"Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi muscle flaps as a reliable technique for breast reconstruction in underweight patients: A bicentric retrospective case-control study","authors":"Koichi Tomita ,&nbsp;Mifue Taminato ,&nbsp;Yoshihito Itani ,&nbsp;Hirohisa Kusuhara ,&nbsp;Hitomi Nakao ,&nbsp;Yu Sueyoshi ,&nbsp;Tateki Kubo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breast reconstruction in underweight patients (BMI &lt; 18.5 kg/m²) poses unique challenges due to limited subcutaneous fat and higher risks of unnatural contours with implant-based methods. This study evaluated the efficacy of fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) muscle flaps in addressing these challenges. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 12 underweight and 38 normal-weight patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction with FALD muscle flaps. Data collection included patient demographics, operative details, fat grafting volumes, complications, and patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q. The underweight group required additional fat grafting more frequently (75% vs. 63%, p = 0.003). Despite smaller flap weights (140 g vs. 165 g, p = 0.08) and reduced fat graft volumes (135 ml vs. 186 ml, p = 0.06), both groups achieved comparable aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative complications, including seroma and oil cysts, were similar between groups. While additional fat grafting sessions were more commonly needed in the underweight group, the final aesthetic results, evaluated by surgeon ratings and patient satisfaction, were equivalent to those in the normal-weight group, with high scores observed across all BREAST-Q domains. This study demonstrates that the FALD muscle flap is an effective and adaptable technique for autologous breast reconstruction in underweight patients. By utilizing available fat deposits and adapting to anatomical constraints, this method achieves both functional and aesthetic success. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and refine this approach for broader application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525001706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast reconstruction in underweight patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²) poses unique challenges due to limited subcutaneous fat and higher risks of unnatural contours with implant-based methods. This study evaluated the efficacy of fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) muscle flaps in addressing these challenges. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 12 underweight and 38 normal-weight patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction with FALD muscle flaps. Data collection included patient demographics, operative details, fat grafting volumes, complications, and patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q. The underweight group required additional fat grafting more frequently (75% vs. 63%, p = 0.003). Despite smaller flap weights (140 g vs. 165 g, p = 0.08) and reduced fat graft volumes (135 ml vs. 186 ml, p = 0.06), both groups achieved comparable aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative complications, including seroma and oil cysts, were similar between groups. While additional fat grafting sessions were more commonly needed in the underweight group, the final aesthetic results, evaluated by surgeon ratings and patient satisfaction, were equivalent to those in the normal-weight group, with high scores observed across all BREAST-Q domains. This study demonstrates that the FALD muscle flap is an effective and adaptable technique for autologous breast reconstruction in underweight patients. By utilizing available fat deposits and adapting to anatomical constraints, this method achieves both functional and aesthetic success. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and refine this approach for broader application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
The use of ultrasound imaging in aesthetic injectables: A modified Delphi consensus International observerships in plastic surgery: Key insights and recommendations for success Do we publish what we present? An updated analysis of abstracts from the 2012-2020 annual meetings of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi muscle flaps as a reliable technique for breast reconstruction in underweight patients: A bicentric retrospective case-control study Reconstruction of cervical radiation ulcer with transverse cervical artery perforator flap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1