Temporal change in the age at time of death in adults with congenital heart disease

IF 1.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100578
Zeyad Kholeif, Omar Abozied, Ahmed T. Abdelhalim, Sara ElZalabany, Amr Moustafa, Ali Ali, Alexander C. Egbe
{"title":"Temporal change in the age at time of death in adults with congenital heart disease","authors":"Zeyad Kholeif,&nbsp;Omar Abozied,&nbsp;Ahmed T. Abdelhalim,&nbsp;Sara ElZalabany,&nbsp;Amr Moustafa,&nbsp;Ali Ali,&nbsp;Alexander C. Egbe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), life expectancy vary by CHD diagnosis, age of the population, and study era, making it difficult to make comparisons between studies. In this study, we aimed to address the knowledge gap regarding temporal change in age at the time of death over time across all CHD diagnoses using a large cohort of adults with CHD with longitudinal follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied adults with CHD that received care at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 9144 adults with CHD that received care within the study period. Of 9144 patients, 1046 (11 %) died, yielding incidence of death of 8.7 per 1000 patient-years. The incidence of death differed by CHD severity groups (7.1 versus 10.3 versus 19.3 per 1000 patient-years, p &lt; 0.001, for simple versus moderate versus complex CHD, respectively). Similarly, the age at the time of death differed by CHD severity groups (66 ± 17 versus 57 ± 16 versus 43 ± 19 years, p &lt; 0.001, for simple versus moderate versus complex CHD, respectively). The age at the time of death was significantly higher in the late era compared to the early era (58 ± 18 versus 50 ± 17 years p &lt; 0.001), and this difference was consistent across CHD severity groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was a temporal increase in the age at the time of death in adults with CHD, and this was consistent across CHD severity groups. The older age at the time of death suggests improved longevity in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73429,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852500014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), life expectancy vary by CHD diagnosis, age of the population, and study era, making it difficult to make comparisons between studies. In this study, we aimed to address the knowledge gap regarding temporal change in age at the time of death over time across all CHD diagnoses using a large cohort of adults with CHD with longitudinal follow-up.

Methods

We studied adults with CHD that received care at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2023.

Results

We identified 9144 adults with CHD that received care within the study period. Of 9144 patients, 1046 (11 %) died, yielding incidence of death of 8.7 per 1000 patient-years. The incidence of death differed by CHD severity groups (7.1 versus 10.3 versus 19.3 per 1000 patient-years, p < 0.001, for simple versus moderate versus complex CHD, respectively). Similarly, the age at the time of death differed by CHD severity groups (66 ± 17 versus 57 ± 16 versus 43 ± 19 years, p < 0.001, for simple versus moderate versus complex CHD, respectively). The age at the time of death was significantly higher in the late era compared to the early era (58 ± 18 versus 50 ± 17 years p < 0.001), and this difference was consistent across CHD severity groups.

Conclusions

There was a temporal increase in the age at the time of death in adults with CHD, and this was consistent across CHD severity groups. The older age at the time of death suggests improved longevity in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人先天性心脏病患者死亡时年龄的时间变化
在先天性心脏病(CHD)患者中,预期寿命因冠心病诊断、人群年龄和研究时代而异,这使得研究之间的比较变得困难。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过纵向随访的大量冠心病成人队列,解决关于所有冠心病诊断中死亡时年龄随时间变化的知识差距。方法:我们研究了2003年1月1日至2023年12月31日在梅奥诊所接受治疗的成人冠心病患者。结果9144名成年冠心病患者在研究期间接受了护理。在9144例患者中,1046例(11%)死亡,死亡率为每1000例患者年8.7例。冠心病严重程度组的死亡发生率不同(7.1、10.3和19.3 / 1000患者-年,p <;0.001,分别为简单、中度和复杂冠心病)。同样,不同冠心病严重程度组的死亡年龄也不同(66±17岁vs 57±16岁vs 43±19岁,p <;0.001,分别为简单、中度和复杂冠心病)。死亡时的年龄晚期明显高于早期(58±18岁vs 50±17岁)p <;0.001),这一差异在冠心病严重程度组中是一致的。结论:成年冠心病患者死亡时的年龄有时间上的增加,这在冠心病严重程度组中是一致的。死亡时的年龄越大,表明这一人群的寿命越长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot – Long-term outcomes into the second decade after transannular patch repair and annulus-sparing patch repair Pulmonary vasomodulators in adults with repaired pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect: Single-center experience and review of literature Role of speckle tracking imaging in risk stratification in Ebstein anomaly Analytical interpretation of hemodynamic data in patients with intracardiac shunts: Role of mathematical modeling Current foetal cardiology practice in Italian centres: a survey among SICP members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1