Toward a green steel production powered by a hybrid renewable energy system: Techno-economic and environmental assessment

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119716
Pouriya Nasseriyan , Saeed Jafari , Hossein Khajehpour , Saeed Edalati
{"title":"Toward a green steel production powered by a hybrid renewable energy system: Techno-economic and environmental assessment","authors":"Pouriya Nasseriyan ,&nbsp;Saeed Jafari ,&nbsp;Hossein Khajehpour ,&nbsp;Saeed Edalati","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steel supply chain consists of several stages, with the most energy-demanding phase being the direct reduction iron process. Syngas, used in this stage, is typically produced from fossil fuels like natural gas, which leads to substantial greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the direct reduction iron production stage was replaced with a proposed process aimed at reducing both energy consumption and emissions while maintaining economic viability. The proposed process (Solid Oxide Electrolyzer − Direct Reduction Iron) was introduced as a potential solution and was compared technically, environmentally, and economically with the conventional (Steam Methane Reforming − Direct Reduction Iron) process. In the proposed process, solid oxide electrolysis cells are used to produce syngas, with the required electrical and thermal energy supplied from renewable sources, solar power and biogas. The results were validated after modeling the process and performing an economic analysis. The comparison between key performance indicators of the two processes highlighted three main findings: first, energy consumption per unit of production decreased by 17 %, from 3.06 MWh/ton<sub>DRI</sub> to 2.53 MWh/ton<sub>DRI</sub>, while energy efficiency improved by 33 %, rising from 52 % to 85 %. Second, the proposed process resulted in near-zero emissions (Green Steel) production due to the use of renewable energy sources. Third, from an economic perspective, considering the carbon emission penalty, the levelized cost of production for the conventional process was 245 $/ton<sub>DRI</sub>, making it comparable to the 249 $/ton<sub>DRI</sub> cost for the proposed process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119716"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The steel supply chain consists of several stages, with the most energy-demanding phase being the direct reduction iron process. Syngas, used in this stage, is typically produced from fossil fuels like natural gas, which leads to substantial greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the direct reduction iron production stage was replaced with a proposed process aimed at reducing both energy consumption and emissions while maintaining economic viability. The proposed process (Solid Oxide Electrolyzer − Direct Reduction Iron) was introduced as a potential solution and was compared technically, environmentally, and economically with the conventional (Steam Methane Reforming − Direct Reduction Iron) process. In the proposed process, solid oxide electrolysis cells are used to produce syngas, with the required electrical and thermal energy supplied from renewable sources, solar power and biogas. The results were validated after modeling the process and performing an economic analysis. The comparison between key performance indicators of the two processes highlighted three main findings: first, energy consumption per unit of production decreased by 17 %, from 3.06 MWh/tonDRI to 2.53 MWh/tonDRI, while energy efficiency improved by 33 %, rising from 52 % to 85 %. Second, the proposed process resulted in near-zero emissions (Green Steel) production due to the use of renewable energy sources. Third, from an economic perspective, considering the carbon emission penalty, the levelized cost of production for the conventional process was 245 $/tonDRI, making it comparable to the 249 $/tonDRI cost for the proposed process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Exergo-environmental cost optimization of a wind-solar integrated tri-generation system through heterogeneous energy storage and carbon trading mechanisms Comparative study of different engine knock metrics for bracketing the octane number of fuels Improving energy efficiency through forecast-driven control in hybrid heat pumps Toward a green steel production powered by a hybrid renewable energy system: Techno-economic and environmental assessment Modelling of biomass gasification for fluidized bed in Aspen Plus: Using machine learning for fast pyrolysis prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1