Efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108498
Mengting Shi , Xueyuan Chen , Ting Lin , Jinhui Xue , Yuanyuan Zhao , Zhixiong Lin
{"title":"Efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor","authors":"Mengting Shi ,&nbsp;Xueyuan Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Lin ,&nbsp;Jinhui Xue ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhixiong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>SMARCA4 (BRG1)-deficient thoracic tumors (SDTTs) are frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage and had poor prognosis, underscoring the critical importance of seeking out novel therapeutic avenues, particularly in the realm of antiangiogenic treatment. However, the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in SDTT remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at SYSUCC from August 1, 2018, to August 15, 2024, screening patients diagnosed with advanced SDTTs confirmed by immunohistochemistry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 151 patients with advanced SDTTs were enrolled in the study, including 49 patients received anti-angiogenic therapy and 102 patients never. The ORR and DCR of first-line therapy with antiangiogenic therapy was 51.4 % and 86.5 %, respectively, compared to only 37.1 % and 78.7 % for those without antiangiogenic therapy. The median PFS of SDTTs treated with antiangiogenic therapy was significantly longer than those without (7.97vs.5.87 months, HR [95 %CI]: 0.612[0.380–0.984], <em>P</em> = 0.043). For patients who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the median PFS of SDTTs treated with anti-angiogenic agent combined with chemotherapy (C + A) was longer than those treated with chemotherapy alone (C) (5.10 vs 2.57 months, HR [95 %CI]: 0.365[0.137–0.968], <em>P</em> = 0.043). For patients received chemotherapy and ICIs, the addition of anti-angiogenic agent (C + I + A) provided significantly longer PFS (11.90 vs 6.90 months, HR [95 %CI]:0.425, [0.221–0.818], <em>P</em> = 0.010). This C + I + A therapy outperforms C + A therapy, showing the longest PFS (11.90 vs 5.10 months, HR [95 %CI]:0.294[0.112–0.772], <em>P</em> = 0.013).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The administration of antiangiogenic therapy shows a promising effect in first-line therapies for advanced SDTT patients. The C + I + A combination therapy is the optimal solution among currently available treatment options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 108498"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500225003903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

SMARCA4 (BRG1)-deficient thoracic tumors (SDTTs) are frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage and had poor prognosis, underscoring the critical importance of seeking out novel therapeutic avenues, particularly in the realm of antiangiogenic treatment. However, the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in SDTT remains unknown.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at SYSUCC from August 1, 2018, to August 15, 2024, screening patients diagnosed with advanced SDTTs confirmed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

A total of 151 patients with advanced SDTTs were enrolled in the study, including 49 patients received anti-angiogenic therapy and 102 patients never. The ORR and DCR of first-line therapy with antiangiogenic therapy was 51.4 % and 86.5 %, respectively, compared to only 37.1 % and 78.7 % for those without antiangiogenic therapy. The median PFS of SDTTs treated with antiangiogenic therapy was significantly longer than those without (7.97vs.5.87 months, HR [95 %CI]: 0.612[0.380–0.984], P = 0.043). For patients who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the median PFS of SDTTs treated with anti-angiogenic agent combined with chemotherapy (C + A) was longer than those treated with chemotherapy alone (C) (5.10 vs 2.57 months, HR [95 %CI]: 0.365[0.137–0.968], P = 0.043). For patients received chemotherapy and ICIs, the addition of anti-angiogenic agent (C + I + A) provided significantly longer PFS (11.90 vs 6.90 months, HR [95 %CI]:0.425, [0.221–0.818], P = 0.010). This C + I + A therapy outperforms C + A therapy, showing the longest PFS (11.90 vs 5.10 months, HR [95 %CI]:0.294[0.112–0.772], P = 0.013).

Conclusion

The administration of antiangiogenic therapy shows a promising effect in first-line therapies for advanced SDTT patients. The C + I + A combination therapy is the optimal solution among currently available treatment options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期smarca4缺陷胸椎肿瘤患者抗血管生成治疗的疗效
背景:smarca4 (BRG1)缺陷胸腔肿瘤(sdtt)通常在晚期诊断,预后较差,这强调了寻找新的治疗途径的重要性,特别是在抗血管生成治疗领域。然而,抗血管生成治疗在SDTT中的疗效尚不清楚。方法我们于2018年8月1日至2024年8月15日在SYSUCC进行回顾性队列研究,筛选经免疫组织化学证实的晚期sdtt患者。结果共纳入151例晚期sdtt患者,其中49例接受抗血管生成治疗,102例未接受抗血管生成治疗。一线抗血管生成治疗的ORR和DCR分别为51.4%和86.5%,而未进行抗血管生成治疗的ORR和DCR分别为37.1%和78.7%。接受抗血管生成治疗的sdtt患者的中位PFS明显长于未接受抗血管生成治疗的sdtt患者(7.97vs 5.87个月,HR [95% CI]: 0.612[0.380-0.984], P = 0.043)。对于未接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的sdtt患者,抗血管生成药物联合化疗(C + A)治疗的中位PFS比单独化疗(C)治疗的中位PFS更长(5.10 vs 2.57个月,HR [95% CI]: 0.365[0.137-0.968], P = 0.043)。对于接受化疗和ICIs的患者,添加抗血管生成药物(C + I + A)可显著延长PFS(11.90个月vs 6.90个月,HR [95% CI]:0.425, [0.221-0.818], P = 0.010)。C + I + A治疗优于C + A治疗,PFS最长(11.90个月vs 5.10个月,HR [95% CI]:0.294[0.112-0.772], P = 0.013)。结论抗血管生成治疗在晚期SDTT患者的一线治疗中具有良好的效果。在现有的治疗方案中,C + I + A联合治疗是最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
期刊最新文献
New conversations in an old argument: Lessons learnt from the PIONEER randomised feasibility study in resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC Emerging treatment strategies for HER2-mutant NSCLC: Striving for selectivity, efficacy, and tolerability Microbiota biomarkers as predictors on immunotherapy response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) and survival Outcomes: Adherence to MTB recommendations in patients with lung cancer treated at two European cancer centers (AdThera-2) First case report of transformation of adenocarcinoma to adenosquamous carcinoma with giant-cell carcinoma harboring HER2 mutation after zongertinib (BI 1810631) resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1