Harmonisation of the diagnostic performances of serological ELISA tests for C. burnetii in ruminants in the absence of a gold standard: Optimal cut-offs and performances reassessment

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Preventive veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106509
Laureline Rivière , Elodie Rousset , Elsa Jourdain , Marie-Laure Delignette-Muller , Thibaut Lurier
{"title":"Harmonisation of the diagnostic performances of serological ELISA tests for C. burnetii in ruminants in the absence of a gold standard: Optimal cut-offs and performances reassessment","authors":"Laureline Rivière ,&nbsp;Elodie Rousset ,&nbsp;Elsa Jourdain ,&nbsp;Marie-Laure Delignette-Muller ,&nbsp;Thibaut Lurier","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>None of the three ELISA tests currently available in Europe for the serological diagnosis of <em>Coxiella burnetii</em> (<em>C. burnetii</em>) infections in ruminants can be considered as a gold standard. The difference in their diagnostic performances (e.g., from 39 % to 87 % for sensitivity in sheep – Lurier <em>et al</em>. 2021) affects the agreement between the test results obtained in different veterinary laboratories and limits the comparability of prevalence estimates for surveillance. In order to harmonise these tests, we tried to adjust their cut-offs so that there is a maximum of agreement between them. Using the results of the three ELISAs applied to 1258 cattle, 1474 goat and 1432 sheep serum samples collected in France, we identified the cut-offs that maximised Hubert’s kappa, an agreement coefficient applicable to more than two tests, using a differential evolution algorithm for optimisation. We then evaluated the effect of changing the cut-offs. In particular, we estimated the sensitivities and specificities of each test at the optimal cut-offs using a latent class model. While the manufacturer’s cut-offs of the three tests were 30, 40 and 40 respectively, regardless of the species, the cut-offs that maximise the agreement are 44.7, 30.8 and 84.3 for cattle, 6.6, 18.8 and 49.8 for goats, and 26.2, 50.9 and 88.6 for sheep. By using these cut-offs instead of those provided by the manufacturers, the observed proportion of disagreement between the tests is reduced by approximately half, and the diagnostic performances and apparent prevalence are more consistent from one test to another. The use of these species-specific cut-offs allows for better harmonisation of the tests. However, before implementing these new cut-offs, it is essential to assess the measurement uncertainty around them to ensure that the analytical performances of the tests are maintained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 106509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

None of the three ELISA tests currently available in Europe for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii (C. burnetii) infections in ruminants can be considered as a gold standard. The difference in their diagnostic performances (e.g., from 39 % to 87 % for sensitivity in sheep – Lurier et al. 2021) affects the agreement between the test results obtained in different veterinary laboratories and limits the comparability of prevalence estimates for surveillance. In order to harmonise these tests, we tried to adjust their cut-offs so that there is a maximum of agreement between them. Using the results of the three ELISAs applied to 1258 cattle, 1474 goat and 1432 sheep serum samples collected in France, we identified the cut-offs that maximised Hubert’s kappa, an agreement coefficient applicable to more than two tests, using a differential evolution algorithm for optimisation. We then evaluated the effect of changing the cut-offs. In particular, we estimated the sensitivities and specificities of each test at the optimal cut-offs using a latent class model. While the manufacturer’s cut-offs of the three tests were 30, 40 and 40 respectively, regardless of the species, the cut-offs that maximise the agreement are 44.7, 30.8 and 84.3 for cattle, 6.6, 18.8 and 49.8 for goats, and 26.2, 50.9 and 88.6 for sheep. By using these cut-offs instead of those provided by the manufacturers, the observed proportion of disagreement between the tests is reduced by approximately half, and the diagnostic performances and apparent prevalence are more consistent from one test to another. The use of these species-specific cut-offs allows for better harmonisation of the tests. However, before implementing these new cut-offs, it is essential to assess the measurement uncertainty around them to ensure that the analytical performances of the tests are maintained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
期刊最新文献
Pathology of new world camelids in Ireland: 13 years of disease surveillance and the significance of bovine tuberculosis in alpaca The use of data for health and welfare management of farmed salmons in Norway, Scotland, and Ireland Impact of dairy farming extension programs on smallholder livestock keepers’ welfare among Maasai communities in Arusha, Tanzania Non-typhoidal Salmonella contamination of food sources from animal origin in Israel between 2007 and 2021 Harmonisation of the diagnostic performances of serological ELISA tests for C. burnetii in ruminants in the absence of a gold standard: Optimal cut-offs and performances reassessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1