Renfei Gao , Cyndi Man Zhang , Xiaogang He , Zhengyu Li
{"title":"Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence","authors":"Renfei Gao , Cyndi Man Zhang , Xiaogang He , Zhengyu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 115322"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.