Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115322
Renfei Gao , Cyndi Man Zhang , Xiaogang He , Zhengyu Li
{"title":"Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence","authors":"Renfei Gao ,&nbsp;Cyndi Man Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaogang He ,&nbsp;Zhengyu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 115322"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关注市场扩张:雄心勃勃的前提和冒险的后果
企业行为理论强调用目标导向逻辑来解释企业的冒险行为。这一传统的学者通常将绩效反馈如何表明问题并引发冒险行为概念化。然而,该理论在理解决策者对前瞻性目标(如市场扩张)的关注及其对企业风险承担的影响方面仍不发达。在本研究中,我们将绩效反馈理论化为决策者关注前瞻性目标的先决条件,而公司承担风险则是这种关注的结果。将市场扩张作为一个重要的前瞻性目标,我们首先将绩效反馈如何影响决策者对市场扩张的关注理论化。然后,我们考察了这种关注如何驱动公司的冒险行为,这取决于公司所在行业的竞争程度。利用中国上市公司的面板数据,我们发现负反馈对决策者市场扩张注意力的负向影响强于正反馈。此外,只有当焦点企业的行业竞争强度较弱时,对市场扩张的关注才会促进企业的风险承担。我们的研究扩展了BTOF文献,提供了新的见解和证据,证明绩效反馈驱动公司关注前瞻性目标,这种关注影响公司的冒险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1