Clinical trial participation for vulnerable cancer patients in Denmark and England

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2025.102793
Lars Hernández Nielsen , Jakob Bruhn Krøjgaard Skelmose , Laurids Østergaard Poulsen , Marianne Tang Severinsen , Martin Bøgsted , Rasmus Froberg Brøndum
{"title":"Clinical trial participation for vulnerable cancer patients in Denmark and England","authors":"Lars Hernández Nielsen ,&nbsp;Jakob Bruhn Krøjgaard Skelmose ,&nbsp;Laurids Østergaard Poulsen ,&nbsp;Marianne Tang Severinsen ,&nbsp;Martin Bøgsted ,&nbsp;Rasmus Froberg Brøndum","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>New cancer therapies are introduced through clinical trials. However, eligibility criteria can pose a barrier to vulnerable patients, limiting access to potentially improved treatments and reducing generalizability of the results. The aim of this study was to investigate participation in clinical trials for vulnerable cancer patients in Denmark and compare results to England.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We utilized population-based registries of systemic anti-cancer therapy from the North Denmark Region and England covering, respectively, 2008–2021 and 2016–2019. We included adult patients (≥18 years) who received SACT in relation to a solid cancer. Vulnerability was defined as the lowest quintile in relation to socioeconomic position. We estimated odds ratios (OR) for participation in a clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 15,173 patients in the Danish cohort and 336,218 in the English. From these 1107 (7.3 %) and 12,502 (3.7 %) participated in a clinical trial, respectively. The adjusted OR for participating in a trial for vulnerable patients was 0.81 (95 % CI 0.68–0.96) in Denmark and 0.80 (95 % CI 0.76–0.84) in England. The strongest associations were found within gynaecological cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found associations of reduced trial participation for vulnerable individuals in both countries and consistent associations within gynaecological cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125000530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

New cancer therapies are introduced through clinical trials. However, eligibility criteria can pose a barrier to vulnerable patients, limiting access to potentially improved treatments and reducing generalizability of the results. The aim of this study was to investigate participation in clinical trials for vulnerable cancer patients in Denmark and compare results to England.

Patients and methods

We utilized population-based registries of systemic anti-cancer therapy from the North Denmark Region and England covering, respectively, 2008–2021 and 2016–2019. We included adult patients (≥18 years) who received SACT in relation to a solid cancer. Vulnerability was defined as the lowest quintile in relation to socioeconomic position. We estimated odds ratios (OR) for participation in a clinical trial.

Results

We included 15,173 patients in the Danish cohort and 336,218 in the English. From these 1107 (7.3 %) and 12,502 (3.7 %) participated in a clinical trial, respectively. The adjusted OR for participating in a trial for vulnerable patients was 0.81 (95 % CI 0.68–0.96) in Denmark and 0.80 (95 % CI 0.76–0.84) in England. The strongest associations were found within gynaecological cancers.

Conclusion

We found associations of reduced trial participation for vulnerable individuals in both countries and consistent associations within gynaecological cancers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
期刊最新文献
Clinical trial participation for vulnerable cancer patients in Denmark and England It is never too late to stop smoking. Applying working estimates of smoking cessation on five-year overall survival gains after a cancer diagnosis A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of human papilloma virus infections with ocular surface squamous neoplasia Eribulin efficacy in long responder patients with metastatic breast cancer: A multicentric observational study The association of different body weight classes and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1