Comparative Analysis of MaxEnt and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Humpback Whale Distribution in North Iceland

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/ece3.71099
Nils Barthel, Charla J. Basran, Marianne H. Rasmussen, Benjamin Burkhard
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of MaxEnt and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Humpback Whale Distribution in North Iceland","authors":"Nils Barthel,&nbsp;Charla J. Basran,&nbsp;Marianne H. Rasmussen,&nbsp;Benjamin Burkhard","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we compared the established MaxEnt and a more novel deep learning approach for modeling the distribution of humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) in north Iceland. We examined the mechanisms, structures, and optimization techniques of both approaches, highlighting their differences and similarities. Monthly distribution models for Skjálfandi Bay were created, from 2018 until 2021, using presence-only sighting data and satellite remote sensing data. Search efforts and boat tracklines were utilized to create pseudo-absence points for both models. Additionally, the trained models were used to create distribution projections for the year 2022, solely based on the available environmental data. We compared the results using the established area under the curve value. The findings indicate that both approaches have their limitations and advantages. MaxEnt does not allow continuous updating within a time series, yet it mitigates the risk of overfitting by employing the maximum entropy principle. The deep learning model is more likely to overfit, but the larger weight network increases the model's capability to capture complex relationships and patterns. Ultimately, the results show that the deep learning model had a higher predictive performance in modeling both current and future humpback whale distributions. Both modeling approaches have inherent limitations, such as the low resolution of the input data, spatial biases, and the inability to fully capture the entire complexity of natural processes. Despite this, deep learning showed promising results in modeling the distribution of humpback whales and prompts further research in different study areas and applications for other mobile animal species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compared the established MaxEnt and a more novel deep learning approach for modeling the distribution of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in north Iceland. We examined the mechanisms, structures, and optimization techniques of both approaches, highlighting their differences and similarities. Monthly distribution models for Skjálfandi Bay were created, from 2018 until 2021, using presence-only sighting data and satellite remote sensing data. Search efforts and boat tracklines were utilized to create pseudo-absence points for both models. Additionally, the trained models were used to create distribution projections for the year 2022, solely based on the available environmental data. We compared the results using the established area under the curve value. The findings indicate that both approaches have their limitations and advantages. MaxEnt does not allow continuous updating within a time series, yet it mitigates the risk of overfitting by employing the maximum entropy principle. The deep learning model is more likely to overfit, but the larger weight network increases the model's capability to capture complex relationships and patterns. Ultimately, the results show that the deep learning model had a higher predictive performance in modeling both current and future humpback whale distributions. Both modeling approaches have inherent limitations, such as the low resolution of the input data, spatial biases, and the inability to fully capture the entire complexity of natural processes. Despite this, deep learning showed promising results in modeling the distribution of humpback whales and prompts further research in different study areas and applications for other mobile animal species.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冰岛北部座头鲸分布建模的MaxEnt和深度学习方法的比较分析
在这项研究中,我们比较了已建立的MaxEnt和一种更新颖的深度学习方法,用于模拟冰岛北部座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)的分布。我们研究了这两种方法的机制、结构和优化技术,突出了它们的异同。从2018年到2021年,使用仅存在的目击数据和卫星遥感数据创建了Skjálfandi Bay的月度分布模型。利用搜索努力和船只轨迹为两个模型创建伪缺席点。此外,训练后的模型仅基于可用的环境数据,用于创建2022年的分布预测。我们用曲线下建立的面积值对结果进行比较。研究结果表明,这两种方法都有其局限性和优点。MaxEnt不允许在时间序列内连续更新,但它通过采用最大熵原理减轻了过拟合的风险。深度学习模型更有可能过度拟合,但更大的权重网络增加了模型捕捉复杂关系和模式的能力。最终,结果表明,深度学习模型在建模当前和未来座头鲸分布方面具有更高的预测性能。这两种建模方法都有固有的局限性,例如输入数据的低分辨率、空间偏差以及无法完全捕捉自然过程的整个复杂性。尽管如此,深度学习在模拟座头鲸的分布方面显示出有希望的结果,并促进了在不同研究领域的进一步研究和其他移动动物物种的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
期刊最新文献
Phenotypic and Ecological Correlates of Population Decline in the World's Anurans. Genetic Basis of Cuticular Hydrocarbon Variation in the Desert Ant Cataglyphis niger. Genetic Sexing of the African Penguin, Spheniscus demersus Using Noninvasive Guano and Molted Feather Samples. Pleistocene Sea-Level Fluctuation Shapes Archipelago-Wide Population Structure in the Critically Endangered Lord Howe Island Cockroach Panesthia lata. Succession of Cyanobacterial Community Contributes to Bacterial and Fungal Community Assembly in Dryland Biocrusts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1