Comparative Analysis of MaxEnt and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Humpback Whale Distribution in North Iceland

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/ece3.71099
Nils Barthel, Charla J. Basran, Marianne H. Rasmussen, Benjamin Burkhard
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of MaxEnt and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Humpback Whale Distribution in North Iceland","authors":"Nils Barthel,&nbsp;Charla J. Basran,&nbsp;Marianne H. Rasmussen,&nbsp;Benjamin Burkhard","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we compared the established MaxEnt and a more novel deep learning approach for modeling the distribution of humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) in north Iceland. We examined the mechanisms, structures, and optimization techniques of both approaches, highlighting their differences and similarities. Monthly distribution models for Skjálfandi Bay were created, from 2018 until 2021, using presence-only sighting data and satellite remote sensing data. Search efforts and boat tracklines were utilized to create pseudo-absence points for both models. Additionally, the trained models were used to create distribution projections for the year 2022, solely based on the available environmental data. We compared the results using the established area under the curve value. The findings indicate that both approaches have their limitations and advantages. MaxEnt does not allow continuous updating within a time series, yet it mitigates the risk of overfitting by employing the maximum entropy principle. The deep learning model is more likely to overfit, but the larger weight network increases the model's capability to capture complex relationships and patterns. Ultimately, the results show that the deep learning model had a higher predictive performance in modeling both current and future humpback whale distributions. Both modeling approaches have inherent limitations, such as the low resolution of the input data, spatial biases, and the inability to fully capture the entire complexity of natural processes. Despite this, deep learning showed promising results in modeling the distribution of humpback whales and prompts further research in different study areas and applications for other mobile animal species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compared the established MaxEnt and a more novel deep learning approach for modeling the distribution of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in north Iceland. We examined the mechanisms, structures, and optimization techniques of both approaches, highlighting their differences and similarities. Monthly distribution models for Skjálfandi Bay were created, from 2018 until 2021, using presence-only sighting data and satellite remote sensing data. Search efforts and boat tracklines were utilized to create pseudo-absence points for both models. Additionally, the trained models were used to create distribution projections for the year 2022, solely based on the available environmental data. We compared the results using the established area under the curve value. The findings indicate that both approaches have their limitations and advantages. MaxEnt does not allow continuous updating within a time series, yet it mitigates the risk of overfitting by employing the maximum entropy principle. The deep learning model is more likely to overfit, but the larger weight network increases the model's capability to capture complex relationships and patterns. Ultimately, the results show that the deep learning model had a higher predictive performance in modeling both current and future humpback whale distributions. Both modeling approaches have inherent limitations, such as the low resolution of the input data, spatial biases, and the inability to fully capture the entire complexity of natural processes. Despite this, deep learning showed promising results in modeling the distribution of humpback whales and prompts further research in different study areas and applications for other mobile animal species.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of MaxEnt and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Humpback Whale Distribution in North Iceland The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Baccaurea ramiflora Lour. Cultivar Ha Chau (Phyllanthaceae, Malpighiales) Phylogenetic Relationships of Immune Function and Oxidative Physiology With Sexual Selection and Parental Effort in Male and Female Birds Intraspecific Responses of Seedlings of Three Vachellia Species to Simulated Browsing Reflect Adaptive Traits of Older Life Stages Upward and Northwest Range Shifts for Four Endemic Lamiaceae Medicinal Herbs in the Third Pole
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1