Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone Regimen (BDR) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: A Retrospective Real-World Analysis

EJHaem Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1002/jha2.70019
Thomas Hueso, Grégory Lazarian, Paul Chauvet, Adrien Chauchet, Ramy Rahmé, Sabine Brechignac, Vincent Lévy, Salomon Manier, Damien Roos-Weil, David Ghez, Claude Gardin, Fanny Baran-Marszak, Eric Durot, Pierre Morel, Thorsten Braun
{"title":"Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone Regimen (BDR) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: A Retrospective Real-World Analysis","authors":"Thomas Hueso,&nbsp;Grégory Lazarian,&nbsp;Paul Chauvet,&nbsp;Adrien Chauchet,&nbsp;Ramy Rahmé,&nbsp;Sabine Brechignac,&nbsp;Vincent Lévy,&nbsp;Salomon Manier,&nbsp;Damien Roos-Weil,&nbsp;David Ghez,&nbsp;Claude Gardin,&nbsp;Fanny Baran-Marszak,&nbsp;Eric Durot,&nbsp;Pierre Morel,&nbsp;Thorsten Braun","doi":"10.1002/jha2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analysed bortezomib–dexamethasone–rituximab (BDR) combination in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) in a real world setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 87 patients were included: 49 patients (56%) were treated in frontline, 22 (25%) in second line and 16 (19%) in third or further line settings. A log-rank test was used to compare overall and event-free survival (OS and EFS) whereas a Gray's test was performed to compare cumulative incidence of deaths and relapse (CID and CIR) according to the IPSS-WM groups, MYD88/CXCR4 mutational status and line of therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall response rate was 88% with five patients (6%) achieving complete response, 20 (24%) very good partial response, 38 (45%) partial response and 11 (13%) minor response. The median time to achieve the best overall response was 9 months and the median EFS was 33 months for whole cohort. Patients treated in third line or further relapse settings had significantly lower median EFS compared to those treated in second- or first-line setting (13 vs. 36 vs. 47 months, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and a higher 7-year CID (50% vs. 13% vs. 12% respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Among patients for whom mutational status was available, MYD88<i><sup>L265P</sup></i> mutation or double mutation MYD88/CXCR4 did not influence OS or EFS. Severe peripheral neurotoxicity affected 7% of patients and 52 (62%) patients relapsed or died as result of WM whereas 21 patients (24%) died of unrelated causes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>BDR represents an interesting chemo-free, fixed duration regimen for patients in first or second line, regardless of mutational status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We retrospectively analysed bortezomib–dexamethasone–rituximab (BDR) combination in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) in a real world setting.

Methods

A total of 87 patients were included: 49 patients (56%) were treated in frontline, 22 (25%) in second line and 16 (19%) in third or further line settings. A log-rank test was used to compare overall and event-free survival (OS and EFS) whereas a Gray's test was performed to compare cumulative incidence of deaths and relapse (CID and CIR) according to the IPSS-WM groups, MYD88/CXCR4 mutational status and line of therapy.

Results

The overall response rate was 88% with five patients (6%) achieving complete response, 20 (24%) very good partial response, 38 (45%) partial response and 11 (13%) minor response. The median time to achieve the best overall response was 9 months and the median EFS was 33 months for whole cohort. Patients treated in third line or further relapse settings had significantly lower median EFS compared to those treated in second- or first-line setting (13 vs. 36 vs. 47 months, respectively, p = 0.01) and a higher 7-year CID (50% vs. 13% vs. 12% respectively, p = 0.02). Among patients for whom mutational status was available, MYD88L265P mutation or double mutation MYD88/CXCR4 did not influence OS or EFS. Severe peripheral neurotoxicity affected 7% of patients and 52 (62%) patients relapsed or died as result of WM whereas 21 patients (24%) died of unrelated causes.

Conclusion

BDR represents an interesting chemo-free, fixed duration regimen for patients in first or second line, regardless of mutational status.

Trial Registration

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone Regimen (BDR) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: A Retrospective Real-World Analysis Safety and Efficacy of Busulphan Based on Dosing Patterns in the Real-World Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Clinical Impact of CD19 Expression Assessed by Quantitative PCR in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing CAR-T Therapy Underrecognised Functional Hyposplenism Associated With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Case Report Lisocabtagene Maraleucel for Richter's Transformation—A Case Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1