Comparison of Online Peer-Assisted Learning and Faculty-Led Teaching for Short Answer Questions

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1111/tct.70069
Gurtek Singh Samra, Kashmir Gaddu, Joseph Ryan Wong Sik Hee, Krupali Brahmbhatt, David Bowrey, Max Seabrook
{"title":"Comparison of Online Peer-Assisted Learning and Faculty-Led Teaching for Short Answer Questions","authors":"Gurtek Singh Samra,&nbsp;Kashmir Gaddu,&nbsp;Joseph Ryan Wong Sik Hee,&nbsp;Krupali Brahmbhatt,&nbsp;David Bowrey,&nbsp;Max Seabrook","doi":"10.1111/tct.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a well-recognised pedagogical approach in medical education; however, research on its effectiveness in online settings remains limited. Multiple-choice questions have been the predominant method for assessing PAL outcomes, despite Short Answer Questions (SAQs) being the superior tool for evaluating knowledge. This study compares online peer and faculty teaching in enhancing medical students' higher-order thinking skills and assesses students' perceptions of these methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Third-year medical students undergoing surgical placements were consented and recruited for the study. Three pre-defined cohorts were randomised to the following arms: no intervention (<i>n</i> = 41), online PAL teaching (<i>n</i> = 37) and online faculty teaching (<i>n</i> = 35). Peer teaching was delivered by fourth-year students (<i>n</i> = 6) and faculty teaching by Clinical Teaching Fellows (CTFs) (<i>n</i> = 6). Academic outcomes were assessed using end-of-block SAQ formatives, and teaching quality was evaluated using the validated SEEQ questionnaire. Knowledge gain and self-perceived confidence were assessed through pre- and post-session tests, validated with a reference group of learners.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Consent for SAQ exam scores was obtained from <i>n</i> = 19 (no intervention), <i>n</i> = 29 (PAL) and <i>n</i> = 21 (CTF). No significant differences were seen between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.650). SEEQ completion was <i>n</i> = 24 (PAL) and <i>n</i> = 30 (CTF). CTF tutors received significantly higher ratings in domains of <i>Learning</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and <i>Group Interaction</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.036). Pre- and post-session tests showed no significant differences in scores (<i>p</i> = 0.957) or self-perceived confidence ratings (<i>p</i> = 0.454).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study shows that online PAL is a viable alternative to faculty-led teaching for enhancing SAQ skills and knowledge acquisition. However, faculty-led teaching offers a superior educational experience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a well-recognised pedagogical approach in medical education; however, research on its effectiveness in online settings remains limited. Multiple-choice questions have been the predominant method for assessing PAL outcomes, despite Short Answer Questions (SAQs) being the superior tool for evaluating knowledge. This study compares online peer and faculty teaching in enhancing medical students' higher-order thinking skills and assesses students' perceptions of these methods.

Methods

Third-year medical students undergoing surgical placements were consented and recruited for the study. Three pre-defined cohorts were randomised to the following arms: no intervention (n = 41), online PAL teaching (n = 37) and online faculty teaching (n = 35). Peer teaching was delivered by fourth-year students (n = 6) and faculty teaching by Clinical Teaching Fellows (CTFs) (n = 6). Academic outcomes were assessed using end-of-block SAQ formatives, and teaching quality was evaluated using the validated SEEQ questionnaire. Knowledge gain and self-perceived confidence were assessed through pre- and post-session tests, validated with a reference group of learners.

Results

Consent for SAQ exam scores was obtained from n = 19 (no intervention), n = 29 (PAL) and n = 21 (CTF). No significant differences were seen between the groups (p = 0.650). SEEQ completion was n = 24 (PAL) and n = 30 (CTF). CTF tutors received significantly higher ratings in domains of Learning (p = 0.017) and Group Interaction (p = 0.036). Pre- and post-session tests showed no significant differences in scores (p = 0.957) or self-perceived confidence ratings (p = 0.454).

Conclusion

This study shows that online PAL is a viable alternative to faculty-led teaching for enhancing SAQ skills and knowledge acquisition. However, faculty-led teaching offers a superior educational experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Online Peer-Assisted Learning and Faculty-Led Teaching for Short Answer Questions Issue Information Urgent Need for Entrepreneurship in the Health Professional Education Curriculum: A Path to Sustainable Healthcare Systems Patient Safety: A Curriculum Taught or a Culture Lived? SIMBA: Online Simulation for Teaching Medical Cases to Preclinical Students—A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1