Effectiveness of Medical Nutrition Therapy Provided by Dietitians on Nutrition and Health Outcomes in Adults with Protein-Energy Malnutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2025.03.005
Lisa Moloney, Violeta Chacón, Sri Lakshmi S Devarakonda, Terese Scollard, Samira Jones, Mary Rozga, Deepa Handu
{"title":"Effectiveness of Medical Nutrition Therapy Provided by Dietitians on Nutrition and Health Outcomes in Adults with Protein-Energy Malnutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lisa Moloney, Violeta Chacón, Sri Lakshmi S Devarakonda, Terese Scollard, Samira Jones, Mary Rozga, Deepa Handu","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is associated with increased morbidities and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) provided by a dietitian, compared to no MNT on nutrition status and health outcomes (mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, quality of life (QoL), weight, physical function, and cost-effectiveness) in adults with protein-energy malnutrition (PEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Food Science Sources and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for observational and controlled trials published in English in peer-reviewed journals from 2000-September 2024. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB tools for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies. Meta-analyses were conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles representing 11 studies (9 RCTs, 1 non-randomized controlled trial, 1 retrospective cohort) with 86,740 participants were included. RoB for included studies were low (1 study), some concerns (7 studies), high (3 studies). MNT may decrease LOS, increase weight (inpatient), and improve QoL (inpatient) (Low COE). In adults with PEM the effect of MNT on nutrition status, calorie and protein intake, body mass index, handgrip strength, and cost-effectiveness is uncertain. The effect of MNT on mortality was uncertain in outpatient settings and conflicted in inpatient settings, with no effect in pooled RCTs (Low COE) and reduced mortality in an observational study (Moderate COE). Its effect on readmissions was also uncertain in an RCT but may reduce readmissions according to an observational study (Moderate COE).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MNT may improve some outcomes (LOS, hospital readmissions, weight, QoL) in inpatients with PEM, but evidence is uncertain for most outcomes (nutrition status, mortality, weight, handgrip strength, QoL) in outpatient settings and requires more research.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is associated with increased morbidities and mortality.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) provided by a dietitian, compared to no MNT on nutrition status and health outcomes (mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, quality of life (QoL), weight, physical function, and cost-effectiveness) in adults with protein-energy malnutrition (PEM).

Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Food Science Sources and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for observational and controlled trials published in English in peer-reviewed journals from 2000-September 2024. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB tools for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies. Meta-analyses were conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.

Results: Fifteen articles representing 11 studies (9 RCTs, 1 non-randomized controlled trial, 1 retrospective cohort) with 86,740 participants were included. RoB for included studies were low (1 study), some concerns (7 studies), high (3 studies). MNT may decrease LOS, increase weight (inpatient), and improve QoL (inpatient) (Low COE). In adults with PEM the effect of MNT on nutrition status, calorie and protein intake, body mass index, handgrip strength, and cost-effectiveness is uncertain. The effect of MNT on mortality was uncertain in outpatient settings and conflicted in inpatient settings, with no effect in pooled RCTs (Low COE) and reduced mortality in an observational study (Moderate COE). Its effect on readmissions was also uncertain in an RCT but may reduce readmissions according to an observational study (Moderate COE).

Conclusion: MNT may improve some outcomes (LOS, hospital readmissions, weight, QoL) in inpatients with PEM, but evidence is uncertain for most outcomes (nutrition status, mortality, weight, handgrip strength, QoL) in outpatient settings and requires more research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Medical Nutrition Therapy Provided by Dietitians on Nutrition and Health Outcomes in Adults with Protein-Energy Malnutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Role of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists within Food is Medicine: Current and Future Opportunities. Teams, partners, or champions? A mixed methods exploration of potential pathways of implementation success for wellness initiatives in schools using the Quality Implementation Framework. Dietary intake of beta-cryptoxanthin, but not other carotenoids, is associated with less frequent anxiety symptoms in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES, 2007-2012. Parental Overvaluation of Child Weight/Shape is Associated with Child Disordered Eating Beyond Associations with Parental Internalized Weight Bias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1