Visual (eyeball) estimation by observers with varying echocardiographic experience reliably identifies severe but not moderate decreases of the fractional shortening in dogs.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0384
Manuel Martin-Flores, Andrea L Desrochers, Mark Rishniw, Joaquin Araos
{"title":"Visual (eyeball) estimation by observers with varying echocardiographic experience reliably identifies severe but not moderate decreases of the fractional shortening in dogs.","authors":"Manuel Martin-Flores, Andrea L Desrochers, Mark Rishniw, Joaquin Araos","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the ability to visually estimate the fractional shortening in dogs and the impact of experience on those assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Right parasternal short- and long-axis cine loops from 25 dogs with varying fractional shortening (6.9% to 61.2%) were distributed online to observers with different levels of training in anesthesiology or cardiology and different experience (advanced, intermediate, beginner, or none) interpreting echocardiography. Observers were asked to estimate the fractional shortening and assign 1 of 5 categories: hyperdynamic (> 45%), normal (25% to 45%), mildly decreased (20% to 24%), moderately decreased (15% to 19%), or severely decreased (< 15%). The answers for all cases combined were graded as correct/incorrect based on each of the 5 fractional shortening categories and compared between participants of each level experience. In addition, answers were reanalyzed using 2 categories for fractional shortening, ≥ 20% and < 20%, to test the identification of clinically important decreased function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers from 240 participants were received. The overall rate of correct answers averaged between 45% and 47% for all levels of experience. This improved from 79% to 83% across all levels of experience when a 2-category scale was used. Participants with advanced experience performed slightly better. The success rate for identifying fractional shortening < 20% when the dogs had moderate and severe decreases was 50% to 54% and 92% to 96%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual estimations of the fractional shortening can be used reliably to identify cases of severe but not moderately decreased function.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>A basic echocardiographic exam may identify dogs with severely decreased fractional shortening. Measurements are required to distinguish those with moderate function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the ability to visually estimate the fractional shortening in dogs and the impact of experience on those assessments.

Methods: Right parasternal short- and long-axis cine loops from 25 dogs with varying fractional shortening (6.9% to 61.2%) were distributed online to observers with different levels of training in anesthesiology or cardiology and different experience (advanced, intermediate, beginner, or none) interpreting echocardiography. Observers were asked to estimate the fractional shortening and assign 1 of 5 categories: hyperdynamic (> 45%), normal (25% to 45%), mildly decreased (20% to 24%), moderately decreased (15% to 19%), or severely decreased (< 15%). The answers for all cases combined were graded as correct/incorrect based on each of the 5 fractional shortening categories and compared between participants of each level experience. In addition, answers were reanalyzed using 2 categories for fractional shortening, ≥ 20% and < 20%, to test the identification of clinically important decreased function.

Results: Answers from 240 participants were received. The overall rate of correct answers averaged between 45% and 47% for all levels of experience. This improved from 79% to 83% across all levels of experience when a 2-category scale was used. Participants with advanced experience performed slightly better. The success rate for identifying fractional shortening < 20% when the dogs had moderate and severe decreases was 50% to 54% and 92% to 96%, respectively.

Conclusions: Visual estimations of the fractional shortening can be used reliably to identify cases of severe but not moderately decreased function.

Clinical relevance: A basic echocardiographic exam may identify dogs with severely decreased fractional shortening. Measurements are required to distinguish those with moderate function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同超声心动图经验的观察者的视觉(眼球)估计可靠地识别狗的严重而不是中度缩短的减少。
目的:评价犬视觉预估分式缩短的能力及经验对评估的影响。方法:将25只缩短程度不等(6.9% ~ 61.2%)的犬右侧胸骨旁短轴和长轴电影圈在线分发给不同麻醉或心内科训练水平和不同超声心动图解释经验(高级、中级、初级或无)的观察者。观察者被要求估计缩短的分数,并从5个类别中分配1个:超动力(> 45%),正常(25%至45%),轻度减少(20%至24%),中度减少(15%至19%)或严重减少(< 15%)。根据5个分数缩短类别中的每一个,对所有案例的答案进行正确/不正确的评分,并在每个级别经验的参与者之间进行比较。此外,使用分数缩短≥20%和< 20%的2个类别对答案进行重新分析,以检验临床重要功能下降的识别。结果:共收到240名参与者的回答。对于所有水平的经验,总体正确率平均在45%到47%之间。当使用两类量表时,这一比例从79%提高到83%。具有高级经验的参与者表现稍好。当狗有中度和重度减少时,识别分数缩短< 20%的成功率分别为50%至54%和92%至96%。结论:视觉估计的缩短分数可以可靠地用于识别严重而不是中度功能下降的病例。临床相关性:一项基本的超声心动图检查可以识别出分数缩短严重减少的狗。需要测量来区分那些功能适中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Atropine induces narrowing of the superior and inferior iridocorneal angle and ciliary cleft in normal horse eyes. A positive view of the lifestyle of food animal veterinarians is the strongest predictor for interest in food animal medicine among students: a survey study. Flumazenil has a dose-dependent effect on recovery from midazolam sedation in Rhode Island Red chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Patient safety investigative methods identify contributors to canine magnetic resonance imaging dermatologic thermal injuries in an academic hospital. Serum protein alterations characterize feline chronic gingivostomatitis: a case-control study of electrophoresis, immunoglobulin, and cytokine profiles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1