Visual (eyeball) estimation by observers with varying echocardiographic experience reliably identifies severe but not moderate decreases of the fractional shortening in dogs.
Manuel Martin-Flores, Andrea L Desrochers, Mark Rishniw, Joaquin Araos
{"title":"Visual (eyeball) estimation by observers with varying echocardiographic experience reliably identifies severe but not moderate decreases of the fractional shortening in dogs.","authors":"Manuel Martin-Flores, Andrea L Desrochers, Mark Rishniw, Joaquin Araos","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the ability to visually estimate the fractional shortening in dogs and the impact of experience on those assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Right parasternal short- and long-axis cine loops from 25 dogs with varying fractional shortening (6.9% to 61.2%) were distributed online to observers with different levels of training in anesthesiology or cardiology and different experience (advanced, intermediate, beginner, or none) interpreting echocardiography. Observers were asked to estimate the fractional shortening and assign 1 of 5 categories: hyperdynamic (> 45%), normal (25% to 45%), mildly decreased (20% to 24%), moderately decreased (15% to 19%), or severely decreased (< 15%). The answers for all cases combined were graded as correct/incorrect based on each of the 5 fractional shortening categories and compared between participants of each level experience. In addition, answers were reanalyzed using 2 categories for fractional shortening, ≥ 20% and < 20%, to test the identification of clinically important decreased function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers from 240 participants were received. The overall rate of correct answers averaged between 45% and 47% for all levels of experience. This improved from 79% to 83% across all levels of experience when a 2-category scale was used. Participants with advanced experience performed slightly better. The success rate for identifying fractional shortening < 20% when the dogs had moderate and severe decreases was 50% to 54% and 92% to 96%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual estimations of the fractional shortening can be used reliably to identify cases of severe but not moderately decreased function.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>A basic echocardiographic exam may identify dogs with severely decreased fractional shortening. Measurements are required to distinguish those with moderate function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the ability to visually estimate the fractional shortening in dogs and the impact of experience on those assessments.
Methods: Right parasternal short- and long-axis cine loops from 25 dogs with varying fractional shortening (6.9% to 61.2%) were distributed online to observers with different levels of training in anesthesiology or cardiology and different experience (advanced, intermediate, beginner, or none) interpreting echocardiography. Observers were asked to estimate the fractional shortening and assign 1 of 5 categories: hyperdynamic (> 45%), normal (25% to 45%), mildly decreased (20% to 24%), moderately decreased (15% to 19%), or severely decreased (< 15%). The answers for all cases combined were graded as correct/incorrect based on each of the 5 fractional shortening categories and compared between participants of each level experience. In addition, answers were reanalyzed using 2 categories for fractional shortening, ≥ 20% and < 20%, to test the identification of clinically important decreased function.
Results: Answers from 240 participants were received. The overall rate of correct answers averaged between 45% and 47% for all levels of experience. This improved from 79% to 83% across all levels of experience when a 2-category scale was used. Participants with advanced experience performed slightly better. The success rate for identifying fractional shortening < 20% when the dogs had moderate and severe decreases was 50% to 54% and 92% to 96%, respectively.
Conclusions: Visual estimations of the fractional shortening can be used reliably to identify cases of severe but not moderately decreased function.
Clinical relevance: A basic echocardiographic exam may identify dogs with severely decreased fractional shortening. Measurements are required to distinguish those with moderate function.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.