Association between dietary acid load and risk of osteoporotic fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08495-1
Atieh Mirzababaei, Mojtaba Daneshvar, Vahid Basirat, Omid Asbaghi, Elnaz Daneshzad
{"title":"Association between dietary acid load and risk of osteoporotic fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Atieh Mirzababaei, Mojtaba Daneshvar, Vahid Basirat, Omid Asbaghi, Elnaz Daneshzad","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08495-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence about the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and fractures in adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Relevant studies were searched through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until October 2024. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by statistical test of Egger. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study confounders. Moreover, the quality of studies was asessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale which is designed for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in this review. According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99-1.21, P = 0.073) (I<sup>2</sup> = 12.9%; P = 0.321). According to subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between DAL and risk of fracture in the cross-sectional effect sizes (N event = 337, OR:0.69; 95%CI:0.47-1.00). There was a significant association between DAL and a greater risk of fracture in cohort studies (N event = 4938, OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22, P = 0.006). Also, high-quality studies (OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22; P = 0.006) showed a significant association between DAL and fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DAL was marginally related to a higher risk of fracture. This finding is a trigger for bone health management with a healthy balanced dietary intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08495-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence about the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and fractures in adults.

Method: Relevant studies were searched through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until October 2024. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by statistical test of Egger. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study confounders. Moreover, the quality of studies was asessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale which is designed for observational studies.

Results: Six studies were included in this review. According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99-1.21, P = 0.073) (I2 = 12.9%; P = 0.321). According to subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between DAL and risk of fracture in the cross-sectional effect sizes (N event = 337, OR:0.69; 95%CI:0.47-1.00). There was a significant association between DAL and a greater risk of fracture in cohort studies (N event = 4938, OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22, P = 0.006). Also, high-quality studies (OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22; P = 0.006) showed a significant association between DAL and fracture risk.

Conclusion: DAL was marginally related to a higher risk of fracture. This finding is a trigger for bone health management with a healthy balanced dietary intake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of patellar lateral retraction and patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The prevalence and surgical outcome of late diagnosed hip dysplasia in children with Prader-Willi syndrome: a retrospective study. Muscle loading and endochondral ossification are involved in the regeneration of a fibrocartilaginous enthesis during tendon to bone healing in rabbits. An update on improvement and innovation in the management of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity. Evaluating the impact of movement representation techniques on recovery outcomes in post-orthopaedic surgery individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1