Orbital Atherectomy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A 1-Year Retrospective Observational Outcome Study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31502
Ayman Helal, Nasir Ahmad, Omar Bajmmal, Javed Ehtisham, Kai Hogrefe, Prashanth Raju, David Sharman, Naeem Shaukat, Mohsin Farooq
{"title":"Orbital Atherectomy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A 1-Year Retrospective Observational Outcome Study","authors":"Ayman Helal,&nbsp;Nasir Ahmad,&nbsp;Omar Bajmmal,&nbsp;Javed Ehtisham,&nbsp;Kai Hogrefe,&nbsp;Prashanth Raju,&nbsp;David Sharman,&nbsp;Naeem Shaukat,&nbsp;Mohsin Farooq","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has advanced rapidly since its inception. Not only in stent technology, but there have been advancements in adjunctive tools including intra-coronary imaging, stent delivery tools and calcium modification techniques. The interventional community is well aware of the difficulties posed by calcified coronary lesions and their impact on outcomes. More recently, orbital atherectomy (OA) has seen itself on the fore front of managing such complex and challenging situations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study analyses a 1-year experience of using OA in a high-volume primary PCI center in a UK district general hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patient demographics, procedural details, and outcomes, including MACE rates and procedural success, were reviewed in all-comers undergoing OA between January 1 and December 31, 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total 53 patients were identified that had undergone OA in a 1-year period. Procedural success was achieved in 98.1% of patients. Thirty-days MACE was 5.7% (three patients). One patient experiencing in-hospital procedural related myocardial infarction and two patients had major bleeding events during the follow up period which is not related to OA. No-flow/slow-flow were observed in seven patients (13.2%), and seven patients (13.2%) experienced coronary dissection that were successfully treated with stent implantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>OA is a new but safe and effective tool for calcium modification in an all-comers cohort of patients treated in a high-volume UK district general hospital setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 7","pages":"1572-1577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has advanced rapidly since its inception. Not only in stent technology, but there have been advancements in adjunctive tools including intra-coronary imaging, stent delivery tools and calcium modification techniques. The interventional community is well aware of the difficulties posed by calcified coronary lesions and their impact on outcomes. More recently, orbital atherectomy (OA) has seen itself on the fore front of managing such complex and challenging situations.

Aims

This retrospective study analyses a 1-year experience of using OA in a high-volume primary PCI center in a UK district general hospital.

Methods

Patient demographics, procedural details, and outcomes, including MACE rates and procedural success, were reviewed in all-comers undergoing OA between January 1 and December 31, 2024.

Results

A total 53 patients were identified that had undergone OA in a 1-year period. Procedural success was achieved in 98.1% of patients. Thirty-days MACE was 5.7% (three patients). One patient experiencing in-hospital procedural related myocardial infarction and two patients had major bleeding events during the follow up period which is not related to OA. No-flow/slow-flow were observed in seven patients (13.2%), and seven patients (13.2%) experienced coronary dissection that were successfully treated with stent implantation.

Conclusion

OA is a new but safe and effective tool for calcium modification in an all-comers cohort of patients treated in a high-volume UK district general hospital setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗钙化冠状动脉病变:1年回顾性观察结果研究。
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)自问世以来发展迅速。不仅在支架技术方面,辅助工具包括冠状动脉内成像、支架输送工具和钙修饰技术也取得了进步。介入治疗界非常清楚钙化冠状动脉病变所带来的困难及其对预后的影响。最近,眼窝动脉粥样硬化切除术(OA)已成为处理此类复杂和具有挑战性的情况的前沿。目的:本回顾性研究分析了在英国一家地区综合医院的大容量初级PCI中心使用OA的1年经验。方法:回顾2024年1月1日至12月31日期间所有接受OA的患者的人口统计学、手术细节和结果,包括MACE率和手术成功率。结果:共有53例患者在1年内经历了OA。98.1%的患者手术成功。30天MACE为5.7%(3例)。1例患者发生院内程序性心肌梗死,2例患者在随访期间发生与OA无关的大出血事件。无血流/慢血流7例(13.2%),冠状动脉夹层7例(13.2%)成功行支架置入术。结论:OA是一种新的、安全有效的钙化治疗工具,适用于在英国地区综合医院接受大量治疗的所有患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With a Novel Valve: Medium-Term Results From a Single Center Study Impact of Individual Culprit Coronary Arteries Revascularized by Primary PCI on Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1