Twenty Years of Experience in One Thousand De-Novo Left Main Coronary Angioplasty With Angiographic Control in a High-Volume Centre Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31488
Alfonso Franzé, Simone Zecchino, Francesco Tomassini, Cristina Rolfo, Enrico Cerrato, Marco Pavani, Giulio Piedimonte, Greca Zanda, Rosanna Di Fonzo, Martina Massino, Marco Lococo, Dario Celentani, Alessandro Migliardi, Roberto Gnavi, Alessandra Chinaglia, Ferdinando Varbella
{"title":"Twenty Years of Experience in One Thousand De-Novo Left Main Coronary Angioplasty With Angiographic Control in a High-Volume Centre Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Alfonso Franzé,&nbsp;Simone Zecchino,&nbsp;Francesco Tomassini,&nbsp;Cristina Rolfo,&nbsp;Enrico Cerrato,&nbsp;Marco Pavani,&nbsp;Giulio Piedimonte,&nbsp;Greca Zanda,&nbsp;Rosanna Di Fonzo,&nbsp;Martina Massino,&nbsp;Marco Lococo,&nbsp;Dario Celentani,&nbsp;Alessandro Migliardi,&nbsp;Roberto Gnavi,&nbsp;Alessandra Chinaglia,&nbsp;Ferdinando Varbella","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Given the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, real-world data are needed to understand the current practice and identify pitfalls and potential benefits, especially for an older and frail population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients, namely 1000, who underwent PCI on ULMCA for de-novo lesions, at our high-volume Italian center without on-site cardiac surgery, from 2002 to April 2023. Cases of restenosis, stent thrombosis, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were excluded.</p>\n \n <p>The primary clinical endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, unplanned revascularization, myocardial infarction and stroke. Secondary clinical endpoints included the individual components of MACCE.</p>\n \n <p>Angiographic follow-up data, derived from both elective and clinical-driven procedures, were extensively available. The primary angiographic endpoint is target lesion failure (TLF), defined as significant restenosis or stent thrombosis of the LMCA. We performed a dedicated analysis comparing patients with a protocol-driven elective angiographic follow-up to those without, to evaluate the potential impact of this strategy on clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our registry encompasses a real-world frail and compromised population, with most patients (75%) presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 739 patients (73.9%), of whom 612 (82.8%) demonstrated good results of the previous PCI and 127 patients (17.2%) experienced TLF. Multivariate analysis identified insulin-dependent diabetes, moderate to severe renal impairment, and a two-stents bifurcation technique as independent predictors of TLF. Among bifurcation techniques, the highest restenosis rates were observed in the Culotte technique (33.3%), followed by T and protrusion (30%) and Minicrush (28.2%), while the single stent approach was associated with the lowest rate of TLF (12.8%, <i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001).</p>\n \n <p>Clinical follow-up data were available for 966 patients, with a survival rate of 95% at 7 days, 86.1% at 1 year, and 70% at an average follow-up of 2033 days. Multivariate analysis identified age over 70 years, moderate to severe renal impairment, multivessel disease, ejection fraction lower than 40%, hemodynamic instability (HDI) and endotracheal intubation (ETI) as independent predictors of MACCE and all-cause mortality while intravascular imaging was found to be protective for both.</p>\n \n <p>A propensity score matched analysis comparing two homogenous cohorts of 131 patients with and without elective angiographic follow-up demonstrated a significant survival advantage in the elective follow-up group, highlighting the potential benefits of this strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the real world setting clinical outcomes of PCI for unprotected LMCA disease are good and mainly affected by age, renal impairment, lower ejection fraction, multivessel disease and by the severity of the clinical presentation (namely HDI and ETI), while intravascular imaging was found to be protective. Notably, insulin-dependent diabetes and two-stent technique are independent predictors of TLF but not of mortality, while renal impairment has a negative impact on both. An elective angiographic follow-up could provide a survival benefit in this setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 7","pages":"1616-1629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Given the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, real-world data are needed to understand the current practice and identify pitfalls and potential benefits, especially for an older and frail population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients, namely 1000, who underwent PCI on ULMCA for de-novo lesions, at our high-volume Italian center without on-site cardiac surgery, from 2002 to April 2023. Cases of restenosis, stent thrombosis, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were excluded.

The primary clinical endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, unplanned revascularization, myocardial infarction and stroke. Secondary clinical endpoints included the individual components of MACCE.

Angiographic follow-up data, derived from both elective and clinical-driven procedures, were extensively available. The primary angiographic endpoint is target lesion failure (TLF), defined as significant restenosis or stent thrombosis of the LMCA. We performed a dedicated analysis comparing patients with a protocol-driven elective angiographic follow-up to those without, to evaluate the potential impact of this strategy on clinical outcomes.

Results

Our registry encompasses a real-world frail and compromised population, with most patients (75%) presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 739 patients (73.9%), of whom 612 (82.8%) demonstrated good results of the previous PCI and 127 patients (17.2%) experienced TLF. Multivariate analysis identified insulin-dependent diabetes, moderate to severe renal impairment, and a two-stents bifurcation technique as independent predictors of TLF. Among bifurcation techniques, the highest restenosis rates were observed in the Culotte technique (33.3%), followed by T and protrusion (30%) and Minicrush (28.2%), while the single stent approach was associated with the lowest rate of TLF (12.8%, p = < 0.001).

Clinical follow-up data were available for 966 patients, with a survival rate of 95% at 7 days, 86.1% at 1 year, and 70% at an average follow-up of 2033 days. Multivariate analysis identified age over 70 years, moderate to severe renal impairment, multivessel disease, ejection fraction lower than 40%, hemodynamic instability (HDI) and endotracheal intubation (ETI) as independent predictors of MACCE and all-cause mortality while intravascular imaging was found to be protective for both.

A propensity score matched analysis comparing two homogenous cohorts of 131 patients with and without elective angiographic follow-up demonstrated a significant survival advantage in the elective follow-up group, highlighting the potential benefits of this strategy.

Conclusions

In the real world setting clinical outcomes of PCI for unprotected LMCA disease are good and mainly affected by age, renal impairment, lower ejection fraction, multivessel disease and by the severity of the clinical presentation (namely HDI and ETI), while intravascular imaging was found to be protective. Notably, insulin-dependent diabetes and two-stent technique are independent predictors of TLF but not of mortality, while renal impairment has a negative impact on both. An elective angiographic follow-up could provide a survival benefit in this setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在没有现场心脏手术的大容量中心进行1000例左主干冠状动脉成形术和血管造影控制的二十年经验。
导读:鉴于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在无保护的左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病中的广泛应用,需要真实世界的数据来了解目前的做法,并确定陷阱和潜在的好处,特别是对于老年人和体弱人群。方法:从2002年到2023年4月,我们在意大利的大容量中心进行了回顾性分析,包括所有患者,即1000名在ULMCA上接受PCI治疗新生病变的患者,没有现场心脏手术。排除再狭窄、支架血栓形成和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。主要临床终点是主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE),这是一个复合终点,包括全因死亡率、计划外血运重建、心肌梗死和卒中。次要临床终点包括MACCE的各个组成部分。血管造影随访数据,来自选择性和临床驱动的程序,广泛可用。主要血管造影终点是靶病变失败(TLF),定义为LMCA明显再狭窄或支架血栓形成。我们进行了一项专门的分析,比较了接受方案驱动的选择性血管造影随访的患者和没有接受方案驱动的患者,以评估该策略对临床结果的潜在影响。结果:我们的登记包括现实世界中虚弱和受损的人群,大多数患者(75%)表现为急性冠状动脉综合征。739例(73.9%)患者可获得血管造影随访数据,其中612例(82.8%)患者既往PCI效果良好,127例(17.2%)患者经历TLF。多变量分析确定胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、中度至重度肾功能损害和双支架分岔技术是TLF的独立预测因素。在分叉技术中,Culotte技术的再狭窄率最高(33.3%),其次是T +突出(30%)和Minicrush(28.2%),而单支架入路的TLF率最低(12.8%),p =在现实世界中,无保护LMCA疾病的PCI临床结果良好,主要受年龄、肾功能损害、低射血分数、多血管疾病和临床表现严重程度(即HDI和ETI)的影响,而血管内成像被发现具有保护作用。值得注意的是,胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和双支架技术是TLF的独立预测因素,但不是死亡率的预测因素,而肾脏损害对两者都有负面影响。在这种情况下,选择性血管造影随访可提供生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Contemporary and Emerging Therapies in the Management of Refractory Angina: A Clinical Review Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Management of Coronary Artery Disease and Aortic Stenosis Bench Testing Analysis of Perforation Management in the Setting of Bifurcation Coronary Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1