Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733
Natalie Disher, Nathan F Dieckmann, James R Case, Felipe Rubim, Karen B Eden, Sara E Golden, Daniel D Matlock, Clifford Coleman, Karen S Lyons, Somnath Saha, Christopher G Slatore, Kelly C Vranas, Donald R Sullivan
{"title":"Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.","authors":"Natalie Disher, Nathan F Dieckmann, James R Case, Felipe Rubim, Karen B Eden, Sara E Golden, Daniel D Matlock, Clifford Coleman, Karen S Lyons, Somnath Saha, Christopher G Slatore, Kelly C Vranas, Donald R Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. However, few treatment decision-making resources exist. In this study, we evaluate a low literacy lung cancer treatment conversation tool to enhance shared decision-making (SDM). The Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer (iDECIDE) pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial evaluates the effectiveness of a conversation tool for patients with lung cancer. Our primary outcome is SDM, a multifaceted outcome consisting of decisional conflict (DCS), decision self-efficacy (DSES), satisfaction with communication (COMRADE), and assessment of lung cancer knowledge. SDM is assessed 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after patients' treatment decision-making encounter. Each measure within the primary outcome will be assessed separately. We began recruiting patients in 2022 from four health care centers and will conduct outcome assessments at four timepoints over 6 months. We aim to recruit 230 patients by 2025. We seek to address the gaps in NSCLC decision-making support using an innovative trial design to determine whether our conversation tool improves SDM and other patient-centered outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05407168 (clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1045-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11988236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. However, few treatment decision-making resources exist. In this study, we evaluate a low literacy lung cancer treatment conversation tool to enhance shared decision-making (SDM). The Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer (iDECIDE) pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial evaluates the effectiveness of a conversation tool for patients with lung cancer. Our primary outcome is SDM, a multifaceted outcome consisting of decisional conflict (DCS), decision self-efficacy (DSES), satisfaction with communication (COMRADE), and assessment of lung cancer knowledge. SDM is assessed 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after patients' treatment decision-making encounter. Each measure within the primary outcome will be assessed separately. We began recruiting patients in 2022 from four health care centers and will conduct outcome assessments at four timepoints over 6 months. We aim to recruit 230 patients by 2025. We seek to address the gaps in NSCLC decision-making support using an innovative trial design to determine whether our conversation tool improves SDM and other patient-centered outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05407168 (clinicaltrials.gov).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用对话工具(iDECIDE)改善肺癌决策:一项阶梯式实用临床试验
肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。然而,现有的治疗决策资源很少。在本研究中,我们评估了一种低文化水平肺癌治疗对话工具,以增强共同决策(SDM)。改善肺癌患者的决策遭遇(iDECIDE)实用的楔形步聚随机试验评估了肺癌患者对话工具的有效性。我们的主要结果是SDM,这是一个多方面的结果,包括决策冲突(DCS)、决策自我效能(DSES)、沟通满意度(同志)和肺癌知识评估。SDM在患者治疗决策会议后2周、3个月和6个月进行评估。将分别评估主要结果中的每项措施。我们于2022年开始从四个医疗保健中心招募患者,并将在6个月内的四个时间点进行结果评估。我们的目标是到2025年招募230名患者。我们试图通过创新的试验设计来解决NSCLC决策支持方面的差距,以确定我们的对话工具是否能改善SDM和其他以患者为中心的结果。临床试验注册:NCT05407168 (clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of anti-CLDN18.2 therapies in advanced or metastatic gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal carcinomas with CLDN18.2 positivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phase II basket study of brigatinib for ALK fusion-positive solid tumors: WJOG15221M/ALLBREAK (a decentralized clinical trial design). Correction. Identifying new targets for the treatment of renal medullary carcinoma: from biological hallmarks to precision therapies. MISTOSUS: a phase II trial of Viscum album extract adjuvant therapy for relapsed resectable osteosarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1