Associations Between Regional Supply and Integration of Home and Community-Based Service Providers and Risk of Institutionalization: Evidence From South Korea.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf007
Sunghun Yun, Hongsoo Kim
{"title":"Associations Between Regional Supply and Integration of Home and Community-Based Service Providers and Risk of Institutionalization: Evidence From South Korea.","authors":"Sunghun Yun, Hongsoo Kim","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the regional density of integrated home and community-based services (HCBS) providers affects long-term care (LTC) service utilization pattern and institutionalization risk in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This observational study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) on individuals aged 65 and older who became newly eligible for LTC insurance benefits in 2018. The final sample excluded individuals admitted to long-term care hospitals during the previous year or those living away from home, resulting in a total of 91,302 individuals included in the study. We analyzed the impact of regional HCBS and integrated care provider density on 4 outcomes: choice of HCBS over LTC facilities (LTCF) as first LTC service, intensity and comprehensiveness of HCBS use, and risk of institutionalization within a year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher regional densities of integrated care providers are associated with increased odds of using HCBS as the first LTC service (odds ratio 1.066, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Increased density was also associated with higher odds of using multiple HCBS (Odds Ratio 1.108, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Additionally, higher density of integrated care providers was associated to decreased risk of institutionalization into LTC facilities (hazard ratio 0.98, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The density integrated care providers significantly reduce institutionalization rates, by increasing the possibility of choosing HCBS over LTCF as their first LTC service and using a more comprehensive combination of HCBS services. Further investment in integrated care models may enhance the effectiveness of LTC systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 3","pages":"igaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: To examine whether the regional density of integrated home and community-based services (HCBS) providers affects long-term care (LTC) service utilization pattern and institutionalization risk in South Korea.

Research design and methods: This observational study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) on individuals aged 65 and older who became newly eligible for LTC insurance benefits in 2018. The final sample excluded individuals admitted to long-term care hospitals during the previous year or those living away from home, resulting in a total of 91,302 individuals included in the study. We analyzed the impact of regional HCBS and integrated care provider density on 4 outcomes: choice of HCBS over LTC facilities (LTCF) as first LTC service, intensity and comprehensiveness of HCBS use, and risk of institutionalization within a year.

Results: Higher regional densities of integrated care providers are associated with increased odds of using HCBS as the first LTC service (odds ratio 1.066, model 1, p < .01). Increased density was also associated with higher odds of using multiple HCBS (Odds Ratio 1.108, model 1, p < .01). Additionally, higher density of integrated care providers was associated to decreased risk of institutionalization into LTC facilities (hazard ratio 0.98, model 1, p < .01).

Discussion and implications: The density integrated care providers significantly reduce institutionalization rates, by increasing the possibility of choosing HCBS over LTCF as their first LTC service and using a more comprehensive combination of HCBS services. Further investment in integrated care models may enhance the effectiveness of LTC systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Regional Supply and Integration of Home and Community-Based Service Providers and Risk of Institutionalization: Evidence From South Korea. Latent Class Analysis Identifies Four Distinct Patient Deprescribing Typologies Among Older Adults in Four Countries. Neighborhood Characteristics and Loneliness in Later Life: The Role of "Person-Environment Fit". Association of Dementia Severity at Diagnosis With Health Care Utilization and Costs Around the Time of Incident Diagnosis. Evaluation and Modification of the Multifactorial Model of Driving Safety Among Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1