Monitoring strategies and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury in patients treated at home.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf086
Wendy Morimoto, Mubarika Alavi, Cynthia I Campbell, Meredith Silverman
{"title":"Monitoring strategies and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury in patients treated at home.","authors":"Wendy Morimoto, Mubarika Alavi, Cynthia I Campbell, Meredith Silverman","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2020 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend AUC-guided dosing over trough-based dosing to decrease nephrotoxicity. This study was performed to add data comparing these dosing methods in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared trough-guided versus AUC-guided dosing in patients receiving vancomycin through two home infusion pharmacies (HIPs). Multivariate analysis was performed to report adjusted relative risks, adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, had an absolute neutrophil count of ≥1000 cells/mm3, a baseline serum creatinine of <2.0 mg/dL at HIP intake, and ≥7 days of IV vancomycin at home. Primary outcome was rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) events, defined as the number of AKI events per treatment days. Secondary outcomes were rate of 30 day hospital readmission and number of HIP interventions (vancomycin dose changes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and sixty patients were included (303 trough, 357 AUC). The mean number of AKI events was 0.84 per treatment day for trough-guided versus 0.63 for AUC-guided dosing (P = 0.11). In adjusted models, there were no significant associations between the exposure and AKI events [relative risk (RR) = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, P = 0.26], 30 day hospital readmissions (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3, P = 0.71) or number of pharmacy interventions (RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in AKI rates among patients receiving vancomycin via trough- or AUC-guided monitoring and dosing through a HIP. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to improve AKI rates using AUC-guided monitoring and dosing among patients receiving vancomycin therapy at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The 2020 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend AUC-guided dosing over trough-based dosing to decrease nephrotoxicity. This study was performed to add data comparing these dosing methods in the outpatient setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared trough-guided versus AUC-guided dosing in patients receiving vancomycin through two home infusion pharmacies (HIPs). Multivariate analysis was performed to report adjusted relative risks, adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, had an absolute neutrophil count of ≥1000 cells/mm3, a baseline serum creatinine of <2.0 mg/dL at HIP intake, and ≥7 days of IV vancomycin at home. Primary outcome was rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) events, defined as the number of AKI events per treatment days. Secondary outcomes were rate of 30 day hospital readmission and number of HIP interventions (vancomycin dose changes).

Results: Six hundred and sixty patients were included (303 trough, 357 AUC). The mean number of AKI events was 0.84 per treatment day for trough-guided versus 0.63 for AUC-guided dosing (P = 0.11). In adjusted models, there were no significant associations between the exposure and AKI events [relative risk (RR) = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, P = 0.26], 30 day hospital readmissions (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3, P = 0.71) or number of pharmacy interventions (RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P = 0.67).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in AKI rates among patients receiving vancomycin via trough- or AUC-guided monitoring and dosing through a HIP. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to improve AKI rates using AUC-guided monitoring and dosing among patients receiving vancomycin therapy at home.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring strategies and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury in patients treated at home. The optrA, cfr(D) and vanA genes are co-located on linear plasmids in linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal clinical isolates in Italy. Antipseudomonal cephalosporins versus piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems for the definitive antibiotic treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: new kids on the ICU block? Applying quality improvement methods to reduce antibiotic use in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnosis and management of refractory and rare moulds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1