Preoperative Assessment of Ki-67 Labeling Index in Pituitary Adenomas Using Delta-Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29764
Kaiyang Zhao, Chaoyue Chen, Yang Zhang, Zhouyang Huang, Yanjie Zhao, Qiang Yue, Jianguo Xu
{"title":"Preoperative Assessment of Ki-67 Labeling Index in Pituitary Adenomas Using Delta-Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI","authors":"Kaiyang Zhao,&nbsp;Chaoyue Chen,&nbsp;Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Zhouyang Huang,&nbsp;Yanjie Zhao,&nbsp;Qiang Yue,&nbsp;Jianguo Xu","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) is a proliferation marker that is correlated with aggressive behavior and prognosis of pituitary adenomas (PAs). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) may potentially contribute to the preoperative assessment of Ki-67 LI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the feasibility of assessing Ki-67 LI of PAs preoperatively using delta-radiomics based on DCE-MRI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>605 PA patients (female = 47.1%, average age = 52.2) from two centers (high Ki-67 LI (≥ 3%) = 229; low Ki-67 LI (&lt; 3%) = 376), divided into a training set (<i>n</i> = 313), an internal validation set (<i>n</i> = 196), and an external validation set (<i>n</i> = 96).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\n \n <p>1.5-T and 3-T, DCE-MRI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Assessment</h3>\n \n <p>This study developed a non-delta-radiomics model based on the non-delta-radiomic features directly extracted from four phases, a delta-radiomics model based on the delta-radiomic features, and a combined model integrating clinical parameters (Knosp grade and tumor diameter) with delta-radiomic features. <i>U</i> test, recursive feature elimination (RFE), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were utilized to select important radiomic features. Support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost (XGB), logistic regression (LR), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) were utilized to develop the models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\n \n <p>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). DeLong test for ROC curves. <i>U</i> test or <i>t</i> test for numerical variables. Fisher's test or Chi-squared test for categorical variables. A <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The combined model demonstrated the best performance in preoperatively assessing the Ki-67 LI of PAs, achieving AUCs of 0.937 and 0.897 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The models based on delta-radiomic features outperformed the non-delta-radiomic model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A delta-radiomics-based model using DCE-MRI may show high diagnostic performance for preoperatively assessing the Ki-67 LI status of PAs.</p>\n \n <p>\n <b>Evidence Level:</b> 3</p>\n \n <p>\n <b>Technical Efficacy:</b> Stage 2</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"62 2","pages":"508-518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.29764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) is a proliferation marker that is correlated with aggressive behavior and prognosis of pituitary adenomas (PAs). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) may potentially contribute to the preoperative assessment of Ki-67 LI.

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility of assessing Ki-67 LI of PAs preoperatively using delta-radiomics based on DCE-MRI.

Study Type

Retrospective.

Population

605 PA patients (female = 47.1%, average age = 52.2) from two centers (high Ki-67 LI (≥ 3%) = 229; low Ki-67 LI (< 3%) = 376), divided into a training set (n = 313), an internal validation set (n = 196), and an external validation set (n = 96).

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5-T and 3-T, DCE-MRI.

Assessment

This study developed a non-delta-radiomics model based on the non-delta-radiomic features directly extracted from four phases, a delta-radiomics model based on the delta-radiomic features, and a combined model integrating clinical parameters (Knosp grade and tumor diameter) with delta-radiomic features. U test, recursive feature elimination (RFE), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were utilized to select important radiomic features. Support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost (XGB), logistic regression (LR), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) were utilized to develop the models.

Statistical Tests

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). DeLong test for ROC curves. U test or t test for numerical variables. Fisher's test or Chi-squared test for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The combined model demonstrated the best performance in preoperatively assessing the Ki-67 LI of PAs, achieving AUCs of 0.937 and 0.897 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The models based on delta-radiomic features outperformed the non-delta-radiomic model.

Data Conclusion

A delta-radiomics-based model using DCE-MRI may show high diagnostic performance for preoperatively assessing the Ki-67 LI status of PAs.

Evidence Level: 3

Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于动态增强MRI的delta放射组学评估垂体腺瘤Ki-67标记指数。
背景:Ki-67标记指数(Ki-67 LI)是一种与垂体腺瘤(PAs)侵袭性行为和预后相关的增殖标志物。动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)可能有助于Ki-67 LI的术前评估。目的:探讨基于DCE-MRI的δ放射组学在PAs术前评估Ki-67 LI的可行性。研究类型:回顾性。人群:来自两个中心的605例PA患者(女性= 47.1%,平均年龄= 52.2岁)(高Ki-67 LI(≥3%)= 229;低Ki-67 LI(场强/序列:1.5-T和3-T, DCE-MRI。评估:本研究建立了基于直接提取四个阶段的非三角洲放射组学特征的非三角洲放射组学模型,基于三角洲放射组学特征的三角洲放射组学模型,以及将临床参数(Knosp分级和肿瘤直径)与三角洲放射组学特征相结合的联合模型。利用U检验、递归特征消除(RFE)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归来选择重要的放射学特征。利用支持向量机(SVM)、XGBoost (XGB)、逻辑回归(LR)和高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)建立模型。统计学检验:受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。校准曲线。决策曲线分析(DCA)。类内相关系数(ICC)。DeLong检验ROC曲线。U检验或t检验对于数值变量。分类变量的费雪检验或卡方检验。结果:联合模型在术前评估PAs Ki-67 LI方面表现最佳,在内部验证集和外部验证集的auc分别为0.937和0.897。基于三角洲放射组学特征的模型优于非三角洲放射组学模型。数据结论:基于delta放射组学的DCE-MRI模型可能对术前评估PAs的Ki-67 LI状态具有较高的诊断性能。证据等级:3技术功效:第2阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
MRI for Lung Cancer Management: Any Closer to Clinical Application? Chronic Liver Disease: Assessing Inflammation and Fibrosis Using Three-Dimensional MR Elastography With Same-Day Biopsy in a Prospective Cohort. Quantitative Confounder Analysis of Electrocardiogram Signals in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 1.5, 3 and 7 T-Assessing Standardized Electrode Positions and Sequence Types-Towards Quality Assurance. Cardiac Involvement After Exertional Heatstroke: Short-Term Cardiac MRI Follow-Up Study. Ventilation and Perfusion Defects on Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI Predict Silicosis Progression: A Prospective Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1