Evan A Perkowski, Ezinwanne Ezekannagha, Nicholas G Smith
{"title":"Nitrogen demand, availability, and acquisition strategy control plant responses to elevated CO2.","authors":"Evan A Perkowski, Ezinwanne Ezekannagha, Nicholas G Smith","doi":"10.1093/jxb/eraf118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plants respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations by reducing leaf nitrogen content and photosynthetic capacity - patterns that correspond with increased net photosynthesis and growth. Despite the longstanding notion that nitrogen availability regulates these responses, eco-evolutionary optimality theory posits that leaf-level responses to elevated CO2 are driven by leaf nitrogen demand for building and maintaining photosynthetic enzymes and are independent of nitrogen availability. In this study, we examined leaf and whole-plant responses of Glycine max L. (Merr) subjected to full-factorial combinations of two CO2, two inoculation, and nine nitrogen fertilization treatments. Nitrogen fertilization and inoculation did not alter leaf photosynthetic responses to elevated CO2. Instead, elevated CO2 decreased the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation more strongly than it decreased the maximum rate of electron transport for RuBP regeneration, increasing net photosynthesis by allowing rate-limiting steps to approach optimal coordination. Increasing fertilization enhanced positive whole-plant responses to elevated CO2 due to increased belowground carbon allocation and nitrogen uptake. Inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria did not influence plant responses to elevated CO2. These results reconcile the role of nitrogen availability on plant responses to elevated CO2, showing that leaf photosynthetic responses are regulated by leaf nitrogen demand while whole-plant responses are constrained by nitrogen availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plants respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations by reducing leaf nitrogen content and photosynthetic capacity - patterns that correspond with increased net photosynthesis and growth. Despite the longstanding notion that nitrogen availability regulates these responses, eco-evolutionary optimality theory posits that leaf-level responses to elevated CO2 are driven by leaf nitrogen demand for building and maintaining photosynthetic enzymes and are independent of nitrogen availability. In this study, we examined leaf and whole-plant responses of Glycine max L. (Merr) subjected to full-factorial combinations of two CO2, two inoculation, and nine nitrogen fertilization treatments. Nitrogen fertilization and inoculation did not alter leaf photosynthetic responses to elevated CO2. Instead, elevated CO2 decreased the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation more strongly than it decreased the maximum rate of electron transport for RuBP regeneration, increasing net photosynthesis by allowing rate-limiting steps to approach optimal coordination. Increasing fertilization enhanced positive whole-plant responses to elevated CO2 due to increased belowground carbon allocation and nitrogen uptake. Inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria did not influence plant responses to elevated CO2. These results reconcile the role of nitrogen availability on plant responses to elevated CO2, showing that leaf photosynthetic responses are regulated by leaf nitrogen demand while whole-plant responses are constrained by nitrogen availability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology.
Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.