Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1
Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose
{"title":"Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.","authors":"Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.

Objective: To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.

Design: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.

Participants: Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.

Approach: We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.

Key results: We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.

Conclusions: Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Personal Cannabis Use in Physicians' Perceptions and Practices Regarding Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain Management. Central Nervous System-Active Medication Use in Older Adults With and Without Dementia-A Retrospective Cohort Study. Effects of the Nudge Theory-Based Multifaceted Intervention on Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study. Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System. More on Food as Medicine: Critical Need for Effective Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1