Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1
Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose
{"title":"Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.","authors":"Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2715-2722"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.

Objective: To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.

Design: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.

Participants: Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.

Approach: We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.

Key results: We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.

Conclusions: Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健中扩大以患者为中心的医疗家庭团队:对VA医疗保健系统内多站点试点实施经验的定性评估。
背景:十多年前,退伍军人健康管理局(VA)在初级保健(PC)中实施了以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)模式,以改善医疗保健获取、护理协调和患者预后。2021年,弗吉尼亚州初级保健办公室试行了三种新的PCMH模式,旨在通过增加新的团队角色和增加小组规模来提高提供者效率和患者医疗保健服务。目的:描述一线员工在实施扩展的PCMH团队模式过程中的经验和教训。设计:在2022年3月至8月期间,对参加PCMH现代化试点的6个VA站点的25名一线员工进行定性、半结构化访谈。参与者:访谈参与者包括医生、护士、理疗师、高风险护理经理和其他工作人员。方法:我们使用了一种快速分析方法,包括创建和验证访谈摘要,开发访谈域矩阵以确定共同主题,以及研究团队之间的迭代讨论以建立共识并解释发现。关键结果:我们发现,当基本的PCMH结构和流程(例如,人员配置,分组,访问前计划)没有到位时,整合新团队成员和增加小组规模是具有挑战性的。通过向PCMH团队中添加某些角色,也引入了角色清晰化的挑战。物理治疗师和高风险护理经理角色被视为PCMH模型的积极补充。最后,将小组规模扩展与人员配备能力相匹配,对于优化团队效率,同时增加患者医疗保健访问至关重要。结论:考虑扩展PCMH团队模型的医疗保健管理人员可能需要在实施之前彻底评估和解决现场准备情况(例如,遵守基本PCMH模型、人员配备和实践)。在添加新的团队角色时,也应该预料到角色清晰度的挑战。物理治疗师和高风险护理管理人员可以对现有的PCMH模式做出重要贡献,以减轻提供者的工作量并改善人口健康管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Preventive Health Services in Reproductive-Aged Women with Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review. Of Hoofbeats, Horses, and Zebras: A "Conversation" with Drs. William Dock, Theodore Woodward, and Alvan Feinstein. Stem-Cell Medicine: Unlimited Possibilities. Mentorship, Productivity, and Promotion Among Academic Hospitalists: Comparisons and Changes Over the Last 15 Years. Sex Differences in Physician Attrition from Clinical Practice Across Specialties: A Nationwide, Longitudinal Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1