Radiation Segmentectomy or Ablative External Beam Radiation Therapy as Initial Treatment for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Experience.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S507267
Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos, S Ali Montazeri, Jordan D LeGout, Andrew R Lewis, Gregory T Frey, Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli, Christopher L Hallemeier, Michael S Rutenberg, Jonathan B Ashman, Beau B Toskich
{"title":"Radiation Segmentectomy or Ablative External Beam Radiation Therapy as Initial Treatment for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Experience.","authors":"Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos, S Ali Montazeri, Jordan D LeGout, Andrew R Lewis, Gregory T Frey, Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli, Christopher L Hallemeier, Michael S Rutenberg, Jonathan B Ashman, Beau B Toskich","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S507267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation segmentectomy (RS) and ablative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are now accepted, definitive, local therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This report aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of RS and EBRT for treatment-naïve, solitary, HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective review was performed of all patients treated with RS or EBRT from March 2016 through September 2023. Inclusion criteria were initial treatment for solitary HCC ≤8 cm and absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Outcomes were censored for liver transplantation (LT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients (RS: 58; EBRT: 28) met inclusion criteria. The EBRT cohort had older patients (median 76 vs 66 years, p < 0.001), larger tumors (median 3.7 vs 2.4 cm, p < 0.001), and worse performance status (p = 0.02). The RS cohort had more patients with ≥ grade 3 liver fibrosis (p < 0.001). Radiologic complete response (rCR) was achieved in 97% of RS and 82% of EBRT patients (p = 0.02). Median time to rCR was 1 month (95% CI: 0.9-1.1) after RS and 7 months (95% CI: 6-7) after EBRT (p < 0.001). The 1-year local control was 97% vs 93% for RS and EBRT, respectively (p = 0.80). Subsequent LT was performed in 48% of RS and 11% of EBRT patients with tumor complete pathologic response rates of 76% (n=22/28) and 33% (n=1/3), respectively. Progression free survival at 1-year was 87% after RS vs 80% after EBRT (p = 0.26). 1- and 2-year overall survival was 88% and 85% after RS vs 84% and 59% after EBRT (p = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RS and EBRT are effective therapies for solitary HCC. Treatment should be determined via multidisciplinary discussion based on individual patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"553-559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S507267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation segmentectomy (RS) and ablative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are now accepted, definitive, local therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This report aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of RS and EBRT for treatment-naïve, solitary, HCC.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective review was performed of all patients treated with RS or EBRT from March 2016 through September 2023. Inclusion criteria were initial treatment for solitary HCC ≤8 cm and absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Outcomes were censored for liver transplantation (LT).

Results: Eighty-six patients (RS: 58; EBRT: 28) met inclusion criteria. The EBRT cohort had older patients (median 76 vs 66 years, p < 0.001), larger tumors (median 3.7 vs 2.4 cm, p < 0.001), and worse performance status (p = 0.02). The RS cohort had more patients with ≥ grade 3 liver fibrosis (p < 0.001). Radiologic complete response (rCR) was achieved in 97% of RS and 82% of EBRT patients (p = 0.02). Median time to rCR was 1 month (95% CI: 0.9-1.1) after RS and 7 months (95% CI: 6-7) after EBRT (p < 0.001). The 1-year local control was 97% vs 93% for RS and EBRT, respectively (p = 0.80). Subsequent LT was performed in 48% of RS and 11% of EBRT patients with tumor complete pathologic response rates of 76% (n=22/28) and 33% (n=1/3), respectively. Progression free survival at 1-year was 87% after RS vs 80% after EBRT (p = 0.26). 1- and 2-year overall survival was 88% and 85% after RS vs 84% and 59% after EBRT (p = 0.34).

Conclusion: RS and EBRT are effective therapies for solitary HCC. Treatment should be determined via multidisciplinary discussion based on individual patient characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射节段切除术或消融外束放射治疗作为孤立性肝癌的初始治疗:多中心经验。
目的:放射节段切除术(RS)和消融外束放射治疗(EBRT)是目前公认的肝细胞癌(HCC)的明确局部治疗方法。本报告旨在描述RS和EBRT治疗treatment-naïve、孤立性HCC的临床结果。方法:对2016年3月至2023年9月期间接受RS或EBRT治疗的所有患者进行多中心回顾性研究。纳入标准为初始治疗≤8 cm的孤立性HCC,无大血管侵犯或肝外病变。肝移植(LT)的结果被删节。结果:86例患者(RS: 58;EBRT: 28)符合纳入标准。EBRT队列患者年龄较大(中位数为76岁vs 66岁,p < 0.001),肿瘤较大(中位数为3.7厘米vs 2.4厘米,p < 0.001),运动状态较差(p = 0.02)。RS组≥3级肝纤维化患者较多(p < 0.001)。97%的RS和82%的EBRT患者达到了放射学完全缓解(rCR) (p = 0.02)。到rCR的中位时间为RS后1个月(95% CI: 0.9-1.1), EBRT后7个月(95% CI: 6-7) (p < 0.001)。1年局部控制率为97%,RS和EBRT分别为93% (p = 0.80)。48%的RS和11%的EBRT患者进行了后续的肝移植,肿瘤完全病理缓解率分别为76% (n=22/28)和33% (n=1/3)。放疗后1年无进展生存率为87%,而EBRT后为80% (p = 0.26)。RS组1年和2年总生存率分别为88%和85%,EBRT组为84%和59% (p = 0.34)。结论:RS和EBRT是治疗孤立性肝癌的有效方法。治疗应根据患者的个体特征通过多学科讨论确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Nomogram for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with High Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index: Validation in Surgical and Immunotherapy Cohorts and Exploration of Immune Microenvironment Mechanisms. Utility of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for the Treatment of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience. Pleione bulbocodioides Polysaccharides Reprogram Tumor-Associated Macrophages via JAK2/STAT3 Inhibition to Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma. MRI Radiomics-Based Evaluation of Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Evaluation of Prophylactic EGD versus Beta Blockade in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients on Anti-Angiogenic Cancer Treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1