Effectiveness of ChatGPT for educators professional development: An empirical study with medical faculty.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/02601060251315795

Wael Sh Basri, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Salem Albagmi, Daneah Alibrahim, Fahad Alanezi, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Duha Sami AlSanad, Wala Sultan Alsultan, Hafsa Alabdullateef, Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Munerah Almulhem, Norah Alnaim, Amal Hassan Alhazmi

{"title":"Effectiveness of ChatGPT for educators professional development: An empirical study with medical faculty.","authors":"Wael Sh Basri, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Salem Albagmi, Daneah Alibrahim, Fahad Alanezi, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Duha Sami AlSanad, Wala Sultan Alsultan, Hafsa Alabdullateef, Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Munerah Almulhem, Norah Alnaim, Amal Hassan Alhazmi","doi":"10.1177/02601060251315795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purposethis study aims to investigate the extent to which ChatGPT enhances medical educators' pedagogical practices, fosters reflective teaching, and contributes to their ongoing learning and growth.Methodsthis cross-sectional survey study assessed ChatGPT's efficacy in contributing to professional development among medical educators. Utilizing purposive and convenience sampling, a questionnaire was administered to 309 medical educators. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA, were conducted to evaluate perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness, considering demographic factors and impairment types.Resultsresource recommendations received the highest mean score (4.08), while continuing education had the lowest (3.62). T-tests showed no significant gender differences (p > .05), while ANOVA indicated significant variances across job roles (p < .0001) and age groups (p < .0001). Lecturers consistently rated ChatGPT's support highest, followed by assistant professors and associate professors, with professors providing lower ratings.ConclusionChatGPT's efficacy in providing personalized feedback, resource recommendations, pedagogical guidance, and other forms of support. However, addressing challenges such as ethical considerations and ensuring accuracy remains imperative for its effective integration into educational contexts.","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060251315795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251315795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purposethis study aims to investigate the extent to which ChatGPT enhances medical educators' pedagogical practices, fosters reflective teaching, and contributes to their ongoing learning and growth.Methodsthis cross-sectional survey study assessed ChatGPT's efficacy in contributing to professional development among medical educators. Utilizing purposive and convenience sampling, a questionnaire was administered to 309 medical educators. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA, were conducted to evaluate perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness, considering demographic factors and impairment types.Resultsresource recommendations received the highest mean score (4.08), while continuing education had the lowest (3.62). T-tests showed no significant gender differences (p > .05), while ANOVA indicated significant variances across job roles (p < .0001) and age groups (p < .0001). Lecturers consistently rated ChatGPT's support highest, followed by assistant professors and associate professors, with professors providing lower ratings.ConclusionChatGPT's efficacy in providing personalized feedback, resource recommendations, pedagogical guidance, and other forms of support. However, addressing challenges such as ethical considerations and ensuring accuracy remains imperative for its effective integration into educational contexts.

查看原文