Does "the More, the Merrier" Apply to the Free Flap Learning Curve? A Ten-Year Retrospective Review from an Emerging Single Institution.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/22925503251322526
Parintosa Atmodiwirjo, Mohamad Rachadian Ramadan, Michael Djohan, Nadira Fildza Amanda, Nadhira Anindita Ralena, Erythrina Permata Sari, Paramita Atmodiwirjo
{"title":"Does \"the More, the Merrier\" Apply to the Free Flap Learning Curve? A Ten-Year Retrospective Review from an Emerging Single Institution.","authors":"Parintosa Atmodiwirjo, Mohamad Rachadian Ramadan, Michael Djohan, Nadira Fildza Amanda, Nadhira Anindita Ralena, Erythrina Permata Sari, Paramita Atmodiwirjo","doi":"10.1177/22925503251322526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Microvascular reconstruction demands specialized and additional training beyond residency. This study investigates the free flap learning curve at a newly established microsurgery center by analyzing free flap viability rate over 10 years. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review of free flap procedures performed between 2014 and 2024 by a single microsurgeon at a National Referral Hospital, Indonesia, was performed to assess free flap viability rates, flap types, and the relationships between specific flap choices and defect locations. The correlation between cumulative flap procedures and flap viability was also analyzed. Statistical analyses, including bivariate and correlation tests, were conducted using SPSS v24. <b>Results:</b> A total of 700 free flap procedures were performed, with a female predominance (51.4%) and patient age of 39 (3-98) years. Sixteen different flaps were utilized, with the most employed being ALT (35.3%), FFF (39%), RFFF (12.6%), LD (3.2%), and DIEP (7.1%). The majority of reconstructions addressed head and neck defects (82.4%). The overall flap viability rate was 91.57%, with specific rates of 87.9% for ALT, 95.2% for FFF, 96.6% for RFFF, and 81% for LD. Chi-square analysis demonstrated significant differences in viability among flap types, particularly ALT and FFF. A negative correlation between procedure volume and flap viability was observed, which weakened after 100 procedures, transitioned to moderate until 300 procedures, became weak until 600 procedures, and uncorrelated entirely thereafter. <b>Conclusions:</b> An emerging microsurgery center will achieve stability after 200 free flap procedures, while prioritizing RFFF and LD flaps as basic or lifeboat options is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251322526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251322526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Microvascular reconstruction demands specialized and additional training beyond residency. This study investigates the free flap learning curve at a newly established microsurgery center by analyzing free flap viability rate over 10 years. Methods: A retrospective review of free flap procedures performed between 2014 and 2024 by a single microsurgeon at a National Referral Hospital, Indonesia, was performed to assess free flap viability rates, flap types, and the relationships between specific flap choices and defect locations. The correlation between cumulative flap procedures and flap viability was also analyzed. Statistical analyses, including bivariate and correlation tests, were conducted using SPSS v24. Results: A total of 700 free flap procedures were performed, with a female predominance (51.4%) and patient age of 39 (3-98) years. Sixteen different flaps were utilized, with the most employed being ALT (35.3%), FFF (39%), RFFF (12.6%), LD (3.2%), and DIEP (7.1%). The majority of reconstructions addressed head and neck defects (82.4%). The overall flap viability rate was 91.57%, with specific rates of 87.9% for ALT, 95.2% for FFF, 96.6% for RFFF, and 81% for LD. Chi-square analysis demonstrated significant differences in viability among flap types, particularly ALT and FFF. A negative correlation between procedure volume and flap viability was observed, which weakened after 100 procedures, transitioned to moderate until 300 procedures, became weak until 600 procedures, and uncorrelated entirely thereafter. Conclusions: An emerging microsurgery center will achieve stability after 200 free flap procedures, while prioritizing RFFF and LD flaps as basic or lifeboat options is crucial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Current Best Evidence for 5 Promising Medications Used for Scar Minimization Therapy. Does "the More, the Merrier" Apply to the Free Flap Learning Curve? A Ten-Year Retrospective Review from an Emerging Single Institution. Indications and Outcomes of Nerve Reconstructions After Resection of Extremity Tumors: A Systematic Review. Experimental Investigation into the Effect of Variable Inflation Intervals on Capsule Thickness in Tissue Expander. Beyond the Surface: Assessing GPT-4's Accuracy in Detecting Melanoma and Suspicious Skin Lesions From Dermoscopic Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1