A deep dive into four thyroglobulin immunoassays from analytical perspective.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2025.2479037
Tuba Saadet Deveci Bulut, Muhittin Abdulkadir Serdar, Mehmet Muhittin Yalçın, Meriç Coşkun, Aylar Poyraz, Seda Gökgöz Acar, Gizem Yaz Aydın, Özlem Gülbahar
{"title":"A deep dive into four thyroglobulin immunoassays from analytical perspective.","authors":"Tuba Saadet Deveci Bulut, Muhittin Abdulkadir Serdar, Mehmet Muhittin Yalçın, Meriç Coşkun, Aylar Poyraz, Seda Gökgöz Acar, Gizem Yaz Aydın, Özlem Gülbahar","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2479037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Serum thyroglobulin immunometric assays (sTg) are crucial for monitoring differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) treatment. However, challenges such as anti-thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) and assay variability hinder evaluations. This study assessed four sTg methods-three second-generation (Architect, Access, Elecsys) and one first-generation (Immulite)-following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared sTg<sub>(Architect)</sub>, sTg<sub>(Access)</sub>, sTg<sub>(Elecsys)</sub>, and sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub>. Precision was evaluated per CLSI EP05-A3, while the lower limits of detection (LLD) were assessed using EP17-A2. Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted as per EP09c, and semi-quantitative comparisons used Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The second-generation sTgs (Architect, Access, Elecsys) exhibited satisfactory precision (<7% coefficient of variation, CV%), unlike sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub>, which showed significant deviations and inadequate sensitivity for DTC recurrence (Limit of quantitation, LoQ = 4.59 μg/L). Second-generation sTgs had strong correlations (<i>r</i> > 0.884) across all concentration ranges (≤1, 1-10, >10 μg/L), with biases (slope: 1.131-2.027). sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub> correlated well with second-generation methods for concentrations >10 μg/L (<i>r</i> > 0.945) but less so for <10 μg/L (<i>r</i> < 0.642). TgAb significantly impacted sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub>. Kappa statistics revealed strong agreement among second-generation methods (κ > 0.800) but lower concordance with sTg<sub>(Immulite),</sub> especially in TgAb(+) samples (κ: 0.562-0.653). Agreement ratios were high for second-generation methods (0.667-1.000) but variable for sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub>, particularly at lower concentrations and in TgAb(+) cases (0.097-0.727).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sTg<sub>(Immulite)</sub> did not meet LLD and precision criteria for DTC monitoring, facing issues with TgAb interference. Second-generation sTgs demonstrated consistent performance across all concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"148-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2479037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Serum thyroglobulin immunometric assays (sTg) are crucial for monitoring differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) treatment. However, challenges such as anti-thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) and assay variability hinder evaluations. This study assessed four sTg methods-three second-generation (Architect, Access, Elecsys) and one first-generation (Immulite)-following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.

Methods: The study compared sTg(Architect), sTg(Access), sTg(Elecsys), and sTg(Immulite). Precision was evaluated per CLSI EP05-A3, while the lower limits of detection (LLD) were assessed using EP17-A2. Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted as per EP09c, and semi-quantitative comparisons used Kappa statistics.

Results: The second-generation sTgs (Architect, Access, Elecsys) exhibited satisfactory precision (<7% coefficient of variation, CV%), unlike sTg(Immulite), which showed significant deviations and inadequate sensitivity for DTC recurrence (Limit of quantitation, LoQ = 4.59 μg/L). Second-generation sTgs had strong correlations (r > 0.884) across all concentration ranges (≤1, 1-10, >10 μg/L), with biases (slope: 1.131-2.027). sTg(Immulite) correlated well with second-generation methods for concentrations >10 μg/L (r > 0.945) but less so for <10 μg/L (r < 0.642). TgAb significantly impacted sTg(Immulite). Kappa statistics revealed strong agreement among second-generation methods (κ > 0.800) but lower concordance with sTg(Immulite), especially in TgAb(+) samples (κ: 0.562-0.653). Agreement ratios were high for second-generation methods (0.667-1.000) but variable for sTg(Immulite), particularly at lower concentrations and in TgAb(+) cases (0.097-0.727).

Conclusions: sTg(Immulite) did not meet LLD and precision criteria for DTC monitoring, facing issues with TgAb interference. Second-generation sTgs demonstrated consistent performance across all concentrations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从分析角度深入探讨四种甲状腺球蛋白免疫测定法。
背景:血清甲状腺球蛋白免疫测定(sTg)是监测分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)治疗的关键。然而,诸如抗甲状腺球蛋白自身抗体(TgAb)和测定变异性等挑战阻碍了评估。本研究评估了四种sTg方法——三种第二代(Architect, Access, Elecsys)和一种第一代(Immulite)——遵循临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)和美国甲状腺协会(ATA)的指南。方法:比较sTg(Architect)、sTg(Access)、sTg(Elecsys)和sTg(Immulite)。采用CLSI EP05-A3评价精密度,采用EP17-A2评价检测下限。Passing-Bablok和Bland-Altman分析采用EP09c,半定量比较采用Kappa统计。结果:第二代sTgs (Architect、Access、Elecsys)具有较好的精度(Immulite),但对DTC复发的检测偏差较大,灵敏度不足(定量限,LoQ = 4.59 μg/L)。第二代sTgs在各浓度范围(≤1,1 ~ 10,>10 μg/L)具有较强的相关性(r > 0.884),存在偏倚(斜率为1.131 ~ 2.027)。sTg(免疫莫来石)与第二代方法在浓度>0 μg/L (r > 0.945)时相关性良好,而r(免疫莫来石)相关性较差。Kappa统计结果显示,第二代方法之间的一致性较强(κ > 0.800),但与sTg(Immulite)的一致性较低,特别是在TgAb(+)样品中(κ: 0.562-0.653)。第二代方法的符合率很高(0.667-1.000),但sTg(免疫莫来石)的符合率不同,特别是在低浓度和TgAb(+)病例中(0.097-0.727)。结论:sTg(Immulite)不符合DTC监测的LLD和精密度标准,存在TgAb干扰问题。第二代sTgs在所有浓度下都表现出一致的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Reference intervals for lysosomal glucocerebrosidase activity in the healthy population. The association between ionized and total magnesium in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. CHI3L1 combined with Th17/Treg cells: a novel marker for the degree of HBV-related liver fibrosis. Interpreting two test results of one analyte from the same individual using bivariate reference values. Patterns of phlebotomy service use in Northern Finland: heavy utilization of laboratory services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1