Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S494911
Anantha Krishnan, Ananya Dutta, Alok Srivastava, Nagaraju Konda, Ruby Kala Prakasam
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Anantha Krishnan, Ananya Dutta, Alok Srivastava, Nagaraju Konda, Ruby Kala Prakasam","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S494911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes-28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"17 ","pages":"83-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S494911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes-28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives. Comparison of Non-Water Proof Mascara Adhesion on the Surface of Different Two-week Frequent Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Comparative Study of Vault Measurement by Pentacam, Casia2, and RTVue in Myopic Eyes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation. Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024). Patient Experience with ABBV-444, a Proof-of-Concept Study for a Novel Artificial Tear with Trehalose and Sodium Hyaluronate for Dry Eye Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1