Breanne Prindeville, Brittany M Szymaniak, Samantha E Greenberg, Adam B Murphy, Ashley E Ross, Debra Duquette
{"title":"\"Hope at a better chance\": perspectives on genetic counseling and testing among black individuals with prostate cancer.","authors":"Breanne Prindeville, Brittany M Szymaniak, Samantha E Greenberg, Adam B Murphy, Ashley E Ross, Debra Duquette","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black individuals have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group. Racial disparities persist in the understanding and uptake of genetics services, while the perspectives of Black individuals with PCa regarding genetic counseling and germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk (GC/GT) remains understudied. This qualitative study explored attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT among Black individuals with PCa. Eight individuals who self-identified as African American and/or Black with a personal history of PCa participated in individual telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed using both an inductive and deductive coding approach, constant comparison, and selective coding. Five major themes were identified: (1) uncertainty surrounding personal relevance of GC/GT, (2) family influence and impact of GC/GT, (3) healthcare providers and institutions as gatekeepers of GC/GT, (4) community identity, influence, and impact of GC/GT, and (5) systemic barriers to GC/GT exemplify larger structural constraints. A key finding was the influence of community, a collective identity among Black individuals and a desire to benefit the Black community, in motivating research participation and pursuit of GC/GT to lessen racial disparities in PCa. Individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and structural factors are both barriers and facilitators to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT. Multilevel interventions such as communicating personal, familial, and community implications of GC/GT, improving patient-provider relationships and genetics education, and addressing systemic barriers are necessary to increase efficacy, utility, and equity in GC/GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00785-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Black individuals have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group. Racial disparities persist in the understanding and uptake of genetics services, while the perspectives of Black individuals with PCa regarding genetic counseling and germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk (GC/GT) remains understudied. This qualitative study explored attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT among Black individuals with PCa. Eight individuals who self-identified as African American and/or Black with a personal history of PCa participated in individual telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed using both an inductive and deductive coding approach, constant comparison, and selective coding. Five major themes were identified: (1) uncertainty surrounding personal relevance of GC/GT, (2) family influence and impact of GC/GT, (3) healthcare providers and institutions as gatekeepers of GC/GT, (4) community identity, influence, and impact of GC/GT, and (5) systemic barriers to GC/GT exemplify larger structural constraints. A key finding was the influence of community, a collective identity among Black individuals and a desire to benefit the Black community, in motivating research participation and pursuit of GC/GT to lessen racial disparities in PCa. Individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and structural factors are both barriers and facilitators to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT. Multilevel interventions such as communicating personal, familial, and community implications of GC/GT, improving patient-provider relationships and genetics education, and addressing systemic barriers are necessary to increase efficacy, utility, and equity in GC/GT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals.
Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues.
The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.
The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.