Fitspiration and Thinspiration on Twitter: A Content Analysis

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Eating Disorders Review Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/erv.3190
Mun Yee Kwan, Ayla N. Gioia, Rebecca Braverman, Kristina Drumheller
{"title":"Fitspiration and Thinspiration on Twitter: A Content Analysis","authors":"Mun Yee Kwan,&nbsp;Ayla N. Gioia,&nbsp;Rebecca Braverman,&nbsp;Kristina Drumheller","doi":"10.1002/erv.3190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Fitspiration, an inspiration phenomenon intended to promote healthy living via exercises and dietary changes has been shown to convey unhealthy messages, contributing to body dissatisfaction. The aim of the present study was to compare thinspiration and fitspiration social media content on Twitter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 301 thinspiration posts and 479 fitspiration posts with the most views from Twitter were collected over a 4-week period for a content analysis. Text, image, and video content were coded by two independent coders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thinspiration posts had more content on thin ideals and disordered eating while fitspiration posts had more content on muscular ideals and healthy living. Content focussing on weight or fat loss, unrealistic body ideals, and body sexualisation or objectification, were present in both thinspiration and fitspiration posts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings support existing literature that both fitspiration and thinspiration content contains unhealthy messages. The current study made novel contributions to the literature by examining food-related and video content, in addition to body-related and text and image content.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"33 5","pages":"895-903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Fitspiration, an inspiration phenomenon intended to promote healthy living via exercises and dietary changes has been shown to convey unhealthy messages, contributing to body dissatisfaction. The aim of the present study was to compare thinspiration and fitspiration social media content on Twitter.

Methods

A total of 301 thinspiration posts and 479 fitspiration posts with the most views from Twitter were collected over a 4-week period for a content analysis. Text, image, and video content were coded by two independent coders.

Results

Thinspiration posts had more content on thin ideals and disordered eating while fitspiration posts had more content on muscular ideals and healthy living. Content focussing on weight or fat loss, unrealistic body ideals, and body sexualisation or objectification, were present in both thinspiration and fitspiration posts.

Conclusions

These findings support existing literature that both fitspiration and thinspiration content contains unhealthy messages. The current study made novel contributions to the literature by examining food-related and video content, in addition to body-related and text and image content.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Twitter上的Fitspiration和Thinspiration:一项内容分析。
目的:Fitspiration是一种鼓舞人心的现象,旨在通过锻炼和饮食改变来促进健康生活,但已被证明传达了不健康的信息,导致了对身体的不满。本研究的目的是比较thinspiration和fitspiration在Twitter上的社交媒体内容。方法:在为期4周的时间里,收集301篇thinspiration帖子和479篇Twitter上浏览量最大的fitspiration帖子进行内容分析。文本、图像和视频内容由两个独立的编码器编码。结果:Thinspiration贴更多的是关于理想瘦身和饮食失调的内容,而fitspiration贴更多的是关于理想肌肉和健康生活的内容。thinspiration和fitspiration的帖子中都出现了关注减肥、不切实际的身材理想、身体性感化或物化的内容。结论:这些发现支持了现有文献的结论,即fitspiration和thinspiration的内容都含有不健康的信息。目前的研究通过研究与食物相关的内容和视频内容,以及与身体相关的文本和图像内容,对文献做出了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Eating Attitudes and Anthropometric Indices of Adult Women in Performance Dance: A Case-Control Study in Greece. Temporal Trends in the Epidemiology of Eating Disorders Between 2000 and 2022: A Danish Register Study of Their Incidence and Comorbidities. Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Treatment Compared With Placebo in Adults With Binge-Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Pathological Eating Patterns in Adults Displaying Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Scoping Review. Change in PTSD and Complex PTSD Symptoms in Residential Treatment for Eating Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1