Improving post-operative pain management after total hip and knee replacement in a special care unit: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000507
Silvia Ruiz González, Tamara López Rico, Esperanza Arribas Arauzo, Janire García Prieto, Laura Albornos Muñoz
{"title":"Improving post-operative pain management after total hip and knee replacement in a special care unit: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Silvia Ruiz González, Tamara López Rico, Esperanza Arribas Arauzo, Janire García Prieto, Laura Albornos Muñoz","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative pain is often underestimated (70% of surgical patients experience some degree of pain) and is insufficiently treated. This increases morbidity and mortality, mainly due to respiratory and thromboembolic complications, longer hospital stays, deterioration in quality of life, and occurrence of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to improve post-operative pain management in the first 4 hours after total hip and knee replacement by promoting best practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit tools were used to collect data and develop implementation strategies, in line with identified barriers. The project was conducted in a special care unit in a primary hospital in Spain using a sample of 30 patients. Three phases of activity were followed: conducting a baseline audit, implementing improvement strategies, and conducting follow-up audits to assess intervention outcomes. The evaluation criteria used in the audits were derived from a JBI evidence summary on post-operative pain management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit identified five barriers: lack of nursing staff knowledge of appropriate pain assessment scales; lack of complete pain assessment record in the electronic nursing records; lack of staff confidence in evidence-based practice; lack of dedicated training time for staff; and low staff participation in consensus process. Strategies were formulated to address these barriers using JBI's GRiP method. Following implementation, compliance with all audit criteria significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strategies developed using the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework positively impacted compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A339.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-operative pain is often underestimated (70% of surgical patients experience some degree of pain) and is insufficiently treated. This increases morbidity and mortality, mainly due to respiratory and thromboembolic complications, longer hospital stays, deterioration in quality of life, and occurrence of chronic pain.

Objectives: This study aimed to improve post-operative pain management in the first 4 hours after total hip and knee replacement by promoting best practices.

Methods: This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit tools were used to collect data and develop implementation strategies, in line with identified barriers. The project was conducted in a special care unit in a primary hospital in Spain using a sample of 30 patients. Three phases of activity were followed: conducting a baseline audit, implementing improvement strategies, and conducting follow-up audits to assess intervention outcomes. The evaluation criteria used in the audits were derived from a JBI evidence summary on post-operative pain management.

Results: The baseline audit identified five barriers: lack of nursing staff knowledge of appropriate pain assessment scales; lack of complete pain assessment record in the electronic nursing records; lack of staff confidence in evidence-based practice; lack of dedicated training time for staff; and low staff participation in consensus process. Strategies were formulated to address these barriers using JBI's GRiP method. Following implementation, compliance with all audit criteria significantly improved.

Conclusion: The strategies developed using the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework positively impacted compliance with best practices.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A339.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Glycemic control in critically ill patients: a best practice implementation project. Hospital-at-home care in Singapore: distilling policy and implementation strategies essential to support scale-up using Policy Labs. Improving post-operative pain management after total hip and knee replacement in a special care unit: a best practice implementation project. Oral hygiene of palliative patients in hospice wards: a best practice implementation project. Determinants of complexity in clinical practice guidelines: a Delphi study including perspectives from guideline developers and implementers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1