DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01517-3
Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Stephan Van den Broucke
{"title":"DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.","authors":"Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Stephan Van den Broucke","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01517-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where preventive interventions like screening and vaccination face challenges due to limited resources. Despite the availability of user-friendly screening methods, uptake remains poor. Psychological theories are recommended to identify and address determinants of screening participation; however, existing models often focus on a limited range of domains and overlook critical belief-related factors needed to encourage screening uptake. A comprehensive, integrated model addressing these gaps could significantly improve the identification of barriers to screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This conceptual paper proposes a model that maps potential barriers to cancer screening uptake through the lens of beneficiaries. The 'Determinants Of Screening upTake' (DOST) model was systematically developed through a series of steps integrating three existing health behavior theories that have been successfully used previously to improve screening uptake: the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the Theory of Care-Seeking Behavior (TCSB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DOST model integrates dimensions represented in existing health behavior models, presenting a detailed map of potential barriers in real world, faced by beneficiaries of screening. These barriers are categorized systematically to enhance understanding and facilitate its use among non-experts in empirical research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By integrating multiple models, the DOST model offers a comprehensive framework that combines theoretical robustness with practical guidelines. It highlights psychosocial barriers that influence screening attitudes, intentions, and uptake. The model can guide the assessment of screening determinants in populations and support the design of educational messages or interventions aimed at increasing screening uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01517-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where preventive interventions like screening and vaccination face challenges due to limited resources. Despite the availability of user-friendly screening methods, uptake remains poor. Psychological theories are recommended to identify and address determinants of screening participation; however, existing models often focus on a limited range of domains and overlook critical belief-related factors needed to encourage screening uptake. A comprehensive, integrated model addressing these gaps could significantly improve the identification of barriers to screening.

Methods: This conceptual paper proposes a model that maps potential barriers to cancer screening uptake through the lens of beneficiaries. The 'Determinants Of Screening upTake' (DOST) model was systematically developed through a series of steps integrating three existing health behavior theories that have been successfully used previously to improve screening uptake: the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the Theory of Care-Seeking Behavior (TCSB).

Results: The DOST model integrates dimensions represented in existing health behavior models, presenting a detailed map of potential barriers in real world, faced by beneficiaries of screening. These barriers are categorized systematically to enhance understanding and facilitate its use among non-experts in empirical research.

Conclusion: By integrating multiple models, the DOST model offers a comprehensive framework that combines theoretical robustness with practical guidelines. It highlights psychosocial barriers that influence screening attitudes, intentions, and uptake. The model can guide the assessment of screening determinants in populations and support the design of educational messages or interventions aimed at increasing screening uptake.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多斯特:一个综合健康行为模型,绘制影响癌症筛查吸收的因素。
背景:癌症是世界范围内的主要死亡原因,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,由于资源有限,筛查和疫苗接种等预防性干预措施面临挑战。尽管有用户友好的筛查方法,但使用率仍然很低。推荐心理学理论来确定和解决参与筛查的决定因素;然而,现有的模型往往只关注有限的领域,忽视了鼓励筛查吸收所需的关键信念相关因素。一个解决这些差距的全面、综合的模型可以显著改善对筛查障碍的识别。方法:这篇概念性论文提出了一个模型,该模型通过受益者的视角绘制癌症筛查吸收的潜在障碍。“筛查吸收的决定因素”(DOST)模型是通过一系列步骤系统地发展起来的,整合了三种现有的健康行为理论,这些理论先前已成功地用于提高筛查吸收:健康信念模型(HBM),计划行为理论(TPB)和寻求护理行为理论(TCSB)。结果:DOST模型整合了现有健康行为模型中表示的维度,呈现了筛查受益者在现实世界中面临的潜在障碍的详细地图。这些障碍被系统地分类,以提高理解和促进其在实证研究中的非专家使用。结论:通过整合多个模型,DOST模型提供了一个综合框架,将理论鲁棒性与实践指导相结合。它强调了影响筛查态度、意图和吸收的社会心理障碍。该模型可以指导人群中筛查决定因素的评估,并支持旨在增加筛查吸收的教育信息或干预措施的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Breast cancer incidence and predictive parish-level social determinants of health in and around Kampala, Uganda. Willingness to pay for injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among male and female sex workers in Uganda. Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination. Methodological heterogeneity and equity challenges of distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare: a systematic review from 2017 to 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1