Evaluation of clinical and ultrasonographic prognostic factors for detection of iliac venous obstructions in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency.

Viviane Chaib Gomes Stegun, Patrick Bastos Metzger, Ana Amélia Carvalho Melo Cavalcante, Thaís Lye Okamoto Yamakami, Fabio Henrique Rossi
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical and ultrasonographic prognostic factors for detection of iliac venous obstructions in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency.","authors":"Viviane Chaib Gomes Stegun, Patrick Bastos Metzger, Ana Amélia Carvalho Melo Cavalcante, Thaís Lye Okamoto Yamakami, Fabio Henrique Rossi","doi":"10.1177/02683555251326040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study evaluated clinical and ultrasonographic prognostic factors correlated with iliac venous obstructions (IVO) in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).MethodsSixty-six patients with CVI were classified into Group I (CEAP C1-C2) or Group II (CEAP C3-C6) and categorized by IVO severity (<50%, 50%-79%, ≥80%). Factors analyzed included age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) history, limb laterality, and reflux in superficial, deep, and perforator venous systems. Multivariate logistic regression identified associations, with odds ratios (OR) calculated at a 95% confidence interval.ResultsPatients in both groups were predominantly female, white, and of similar age. Group I patients had higher BMI and lower abdominal circumference than Group II. Arterial hypertension was common in both groups, but deep vein thrombosis history was absent in Group I and present in 27.45% of Group II. Venous reflux was more frequent in Group II (74.5%) compared to Group I (36.7%). Regarding severity of IVO in Group II, 50% of limbs had <50% obstruction, 26.5% of limbs had 50%-79% obstruction, and 23.5% of limbs had ≥80% obstruction. Left limb was more frequently affected (70.58%) in significant obstructions found in Group II. Positive correlations were observed between IVO, non-recanalized DVT, and venous obstruction severity. Reflux in the deep venous system was a significant predictor for severe IVO in advanced chronic venous insufficiency patients (OR = 3.7, <i>p</i> = .02).ConclusionsDeep venous reflux was shown to be a prognostic factor for detecting critical IVO in patients with advanced CVI. History of DVT, presence of reflux in the venous system of the lower limbs and non-recanalized DVT in advanced chronic venous insufficiency patients indicate the need for screening for IVO additional cross-sectional imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251326040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251326040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study evaluated clinical and ultrasonographic prognostic factors correlated with iliac venous obstructions (IVO) in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).MethodsSixty-six patients with CVI were classified into Group I (CEAP C1-C2) or Group II (CEAP C3-C6) and categorized by IVO severity (<50%, 50%-79%, ≥80%). Factors analyzed included age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) history, limb laterality, and reflux in superficial, deep, and perforator venous systems. Multivariate logistic regression identified associations, with odds ratios (OR) calculated at a 95% confidence interval.ResultsPatients in both groups were predominantly female, white, and of similar age. Group I patients had higher BMI and lower abdominal circumference than Group II. Arterial hypertension was common in both groups, but deep vein thrombosis history was absent in Group I and present in 27.45% of Group II. Venous reflux was more frequent in Group II (74.5%) compared to Group I (36.7%). Regarding severity of IVO in Group II, 50% of limbs had <50% obstruction, 26.5% of limbs had 50%-79% obstruction, and 23.5% of limbs had ≥80% obstruction. Left limb was more frequently affected (70.58%) in significant obstructions found in Group II. Positive correlations were observed between IVO, non-recanalized DVT, and venous obstruction severity. Reflux in the deep venous system was a significant predictor for severe IVO in advanced chronic venous insufficiency patients (OR = 3.7, p = .02).ConclusionsDeep venous reflux was shown to be a prognostic factor for detecting critical IVO in patients with advanced CVI. History of DVT, presence of reflux in the venous system of the lower limbs and non-recanalized DVT in advanced chronic venous insufficiency patients indicate the need for screening for IVO additional cross-sectional imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of static foot disorder and ankle range of motion in chronic venous insufficiency patients. Evaluation of clinical and ultrasonographic prognostic factors for detection of iliac venous obstructions in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency. Risk acceptance for deep venous interventions of the lower limb. Application of preoperative ultrasound combined with indocyanine green lymphography in lymphaticovenular anastomosis of the lower limb-A retrospective study research. The efficacy of aspirin compared to low molecular weight heparin as thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1