Development of UV-Chemometric techniques for resolving the overlapped spectra of aspirin, caffeine and orphenadrine citrate in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form

IF 4.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s13065-025-01429-x
Sobhy M. El-Adl, Amr A. Mattar, Omar M. El-Abassy, Mahmoud M. Sebaiy
{"title":"Development of UV-Chemometric techniques for resolving the overlapped spectra of aspirin, caffeine and orphenadrine citrate in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form","authors":"Sobhy M. El-Adl,&nbsp;Amr A. Mattar,&nbsp;Omar M. El-Abassy,&nbsp;Mahmoud M. Sebaiy","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01429-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A UV-chemometric approach has been developed to analyze a ternary combination of aspirin, caffeine, and orphenadrine citrate without the need for previous separation. The method is easy, specific, accurate, and highly precise. The three medications were evaluated simultaneously utilizing CLS, PLS, and PCR, which were generated based on separate data sets that yielded superior findings. Regrettably, their accurate estimation could only be achieved using the PLS approach. In order to determine the prediction power of each chemometric approach, its validity has been tested using 8 synthetic mixes. The latent variable number varies across various models as the dataset changes. The comparison of various methodologies and the assessment of the predictive capacity of each set of data were done using the predicted residual error sum of squares (PRESS) and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). The created approach was also used to statistically compare the performance of PLS in a dataset with zero absorption, as well as to compare the performance of the offered chemometric methods in various datasets. The environmental impact of the created approach was assessed to determine the overall ecological sustainability of the designed methodology. According to the new Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) evaluation methodology, the suggested technique was also found to be practicable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-025-01429-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-025-01429-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A UV-chemometric approach has been developed to analyze a ternary combination of aspirin, caffeine, and orphenadrine citrate without the need for previous separation. The method is easy, specific, accurate, and highly precise. The three medications were evaluated simultaneously utilizing CLS, PLS, and PCR, which were generated based on separate data sets that yielded superior findings. Regrettably, their accurate estimation could only be achieved using the PLS approach. In order to determine the prediction power of each chemometric approach, its validity has been tested using 8 synthetic mixes. The latent variable number varies across various models as the dataset changes. The comparison of various methodologies and the assessment of the predictive capacity of each set of data were done using the predicted residual error sum of squares (PRESS) and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). The created approach was also used to statistically compare the performance of PLS in a dataset with zero absorption, as well as to compare the performance of the offered chemometric methods in various datasets. The environmental impact of the created approach was assessed to determine the overall ecological sustainability of the designed methodology. According to the new Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) evaluation methodology, the suggested technique was also found to be practicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Development of UV-Chemometric techniques for resolving the overlapped spectra of aspirin, caffeine and orphenadrine citrate in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form Ultra-performance liquid chromatography method for quantitative analysis of nystatin and triamcinolone acetonide in topical creams after in vitro release using franz diffusion cell A stability-indicating potentiometric platform for assaying Metoprolol succinate and felodipine in their tablets and human plasma Adsorption of heavy metals from wastewater using reduced graphene oxide@titanate hybrids in batch and fixed bed systems Spectroscopic, docking, antiproliferative, and anticancer activity of novel metal derivatives of phenylacetohydrazide Schiff base on different human cancer cell lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1