Rupture of Breast Implants Does Not Cause Systemic or Local Immune Changes.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae244
Puja Jagasia, Ramsey Timmerman, David Dolivo, Sophia Allison, Seok Jong Hong, Robert Galiano, John Y S Kim, Megan Fracol
{"title":"Rupture of Breast Implants Does Not Cause Systemic or Local Immune Changes.","authors":"Puja Jagasia, Ramsey Timmerman, David Dolivo, Sophia Allison, Seok Jong Hong, Robert Galiano, John Y S Kim, Megan Fracol","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast implant rupture occurs in both saline and silicone implants, with estimated risk of rupture between 5.3% and 15.1% over a 10-year period. Concerns regarding the effect of breast implants on the immune system remain despite currently published data that does not support a link between implants, ruptured or not, and autoimmune symptoms. The authors aimed to determine if there were systemic or local immune changes caused by implant rupture. Healthy females with either ruptured or intact breast implants were recruited. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to examine systemic levels of 6 antibodies against breast-related antigens. Bulk RNA-sequencing of breast tissue adjacent to the implant was analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Sixty-seven females were assessed with ELISA. Of those, 24% (16/67) had ruptured breast implants and 76% (51/67) had intact implants. There were no differences in antibody levels between intact and ruptured implants. Subgroup analyses of ruptured implants revealed no differences in antibody levels between ruptured saline and silicone implants, submuscular and subglandular implants, or textured and smooth implants. Bulk RNA-sequencing of breast tissue adjacent to ruptured implants (n = 5) and intact implants (n = 5) was performed. This revealed only 1 immune-related DEG (MS4A1), which was a downregulated gene related to B cell activation and differentiation. Rupture of breast implants was not associated with systemic changes in antibody levels or local changes in gene expression of breast parenchyma. There was no evidence for immune-related changes that might explain the autoimmune-like clinical symptoms some patients experience after implant rupture. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"463-469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast implant rupture occurs in both saline and silicone implants, with estimated risk of rupture between 5.3% and 15.1% over a 10-year period. Concerns regarding the effect of breast implants on the immune system remain despite currently published data that does not support a link between implants, ruptured or not, and autoimmune symptoms. The authors aimed to determine if there were systemic or local immune changes caused by implant rupture. Healthy females with either ruptured or intact breast implants were recruited. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to examine systemic levels of 6 antibodies against breast-related antigens. Bulk RNA-sequencing of breast tissue adjacent to the implant was analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Sixty-seven females were assessed with ELISA. Of those, 24% (16/67) had ruptured breast implants and 76% (51/67) had intact implants. There were no differences in antibody levels between intact and ruptured implants. Subgroup analyses of ruptured implants revealed no differences in antibody levels between ruptured saline and silicone implants, submuscular and subglandular implants, or textured and smooth implants. Bulk RNA-sequencing of breast tissue adjacent to ruptured implants (n = 5) and intact implants (n = 5) was performed. This revealed only 1 immune-related DEG (MS4A1), which was a downregulated gene related to B cell activation and differentiation. Rupture of breast implants was not associated with systemic changes in antibody levels or local changes in gene expression of breast parenchyma. There was no evidence for immune-related changes that might explain the autoimmune-like clinical symptoms some patients experience after implant rupture. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳房植入物破裂不会引起全身或局部免疫改变。
乳房植入物破裂发生在生理盐水和硅胶植入物中,在10年期间破裂的风险估计在5.3%到15.1%之间。尽管目前公布的数据不支持植入物(无论是否破裂)与自身免疫症状之间的联系,但关于乳房植入物对免疫系统的影响的担忧仍然存在。作者的目的是确定种植体破裂是否引起全身或局部免疫改变。研究招募了乳房植入物破裂或完整的健康女性。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测6种乳腺相关抗原的全身抗体水平。对植入物附近乳腺组织的大量rna测序进行分析,以鉴定差异表达基因(DEGs)。67名女性采用ELISA法进行评估。其中,24%(16/67)的假体破裂,76%(51/67)的假体完好。在完整和破裂的种植体之间,抗体水平没有差异。破裂假体的亚组分析显示,破裂的生理盐水假体和硅胶假体、肌肉下和腺体下假体、纹理和光滑假体之间的抗体水平没有差异。对破裂假体(n = 5)和完整假体(n = 5)相邻的乳腺组织进行大量rna测序。这表明只有1个免疫相关的DEG (MS4A1),这是一个与B细胞活化和分化相关的下调基因。乳房植入物的破裂与抗体水平的全身性变化或乳房实质基因表达的局部变化无关。没有证据表明免疫相关的改变可以解释一些患者在植入物破裂后出现的自身免疫样临床症状。证据等级:3(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Nasal Aesthetic Preferences Across Populations: A Systematic Review of Cultural, Ethnic, and Generational Trends. Ozempification of Aesthetics: Why Plastic Surgeons Must Lead the GLP-1 Era. Comparison of Patient Reviews for Submental Liposuction and Kybella Using Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing: Is There a Superior Intervention for Submental Adiposity? Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Longitudinal Analysis of Facial Skeletal Aging. Neck Lift After Nonsurgical Treatments: Fibrosis, Fat Loss, and Surgical Complexity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1