Midazolam premedication facilitates mask ventilation in children during propofol induction of anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-03002-4
Rafet Yarimoglu, Betul Basaran, Tayfun Et, Aysegul Bilge, Muhammet Korkusuz
{"title":"Midazolam premedication facilitates mask ventilation in children during propofol induction of anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Rafet Yarimoglu, Betul Basaran, Tayfun Et, Aysegul Bilge, Muhammet Korkusuz","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03002-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mask ventilation is the most widely used method to provide ventilation during anesthesia induction. Appropriate head and neck positions, exaggerated jaw lifts, two-hand and two-person ventilation, and the use of oral or nasal airways can facilitate mask ventilation. Neuromuscular blockers and premedication drugs such as midazolam and dexmedetomidine have also been proposed to facilitate mask ventilation. The hypothesis of this study was that midazolam premedication would facilitate mask ventilation in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 2-10 years were randomized into two groups. The midazolam group (Group M) received an intravenous dose of midazolam premedication (0.1 mg/kg, maximum dose 3 mg), and the control group received an intravenous dose of saline of the same volume (Group C). The primary outcome of the study was to examine the effect of midazolam premedication on mask ventilation in children, using the Han mask grading scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 120 children were analyzed (n = 60 in Group M, n = 60 in Group C). According to the Han mask grading scale, the scores of the patients in the midazolam group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The distribution of Han scores was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001). In the midazolam group, 93.3% of the children had a Han score of 1 and 6.7% had 2, and in the control group, 60% had a score of 1, and 40% had 2. In the subgroup analysis of overweight children, a Han score of 1 was determined in 91.7% of the midazolam group and 61.1% of the control group (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the results of this clinical research demonstrated that midazolam premedication improves mask ventilation in children during general anesthesia induction. The findings also showed that the effect of midazolam in facilitating mask ventilation was similar in overweight children.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (trial ID: NCT05368441 on 10/05/2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03002-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Mask ventilation is the most widely used method to provide ventilation during anesthesia induction. Appropriate head and neck positions, exaggerated jaw lifts, two-hand and two-person ventilation, and the use of oral or nasal airways can facilitate mask ventilation. Neuromuscular blockers and premedication drugs such as midazolam and dexmedetomidine have also been proposed to facilitate mask ventilation. The hypothesis of this study was that midazolam premedication would facilitate mask ventilation in children.

Methods: Children aged 2-10 years were randomized into two groups. The midazolam group (Group M) received an intravenous dose of midazolam premedication (0.1 mg/kg, maximum dose 3 mg), and the control group received an intravenous dose of saline of the same volume (Group C). The primary outcome of the study was to examine the effect of midazolam premedication on mask ventilation in children, using the Han mask grading scale.

Results: The data of 120 children were analyzed (n = 60 in Group M, n = 60 in Group C). According to the Han mask grading scale, the scores of the patients in the midazolam group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The distribution of Han scores was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001). In the midazolam group, 93.3% of the children had a Han score of 1 and 6.7% had 2, and in the control group, 60% had a score of 1, and 40% had 2. In the subgroup analysis of overweight children, a Han score of 1 was determined in 91.7% of the midazolam group and 61.1% of the control group (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: In conclusion, the results of this clinical research demonstrated that midazolam premedication improves mask ventilation in children during general anesthesia induction. The findings also showed that the effect of midazolam in facilitating mask ventilation was similar in overweight children.

Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (trial ID: NCT05368441 on 10/05/2022).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Midazolam premedication facilitates mask ventilation in children during propofol induction of anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. Impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine on long-term outcomes in older patients following cardiac surgery: follow-up of a randomized trial. Suppressive effects of deep balanced anesthesia on cellular immunity and protein expression: a randomized-controlled pilot study. Clinical predictors of extubation failure in postoperative critically ill patients: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Comparison of remimazolam tosylate and propofol in hemodynamic stability, postoperative cognitive function, and recovery in general anesthesia combined with regional nerve blocks: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1