Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi
{"title":"Assessment of Interrater Reliability for Interpretation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging of the Quadriceps Femoris.","authors":"Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and corrected echo intensity (C-EI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13 to 50 years with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus medialis obliquis (VMO), and EI of the RF. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for CSA of the RF (median ICC 0.86 MD and 0.84 PT), CSA of the VMO (0.82 and 0.82), and EI mean (0.92 and 0.92). RF CSA had the smallest CV (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest CV (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and corrected echo intensity (C-EI).
Design: A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13 to 50 years with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus medialis obliquis (VMO), and EI of the RF. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.
Results: Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for CSA of the RF (median ICC 0.86 MD and 0.84 PT), CSA of the VMO (0.82 and 0.82), and EI mean (0.92 and 0.92). RF CSA had the smallest CV (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest CV (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).