Evaluation of instruments assessing peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis: an analysis of the ASAS-PerSpA study.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.011
Dafne Capelusnik, Clementina Lopez-Medina, Désirée van der Heijde, Robert Landewé, Maxime Dougados, Joachim Sieper, Anna Molto, Sofia Ramiro
{"title":"Evaluation of instruments assessing peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis: an analysis of the ASAS-PerSpA study.","authors":"Dafne Capelusnik, Clementina Lopez-Medina, Désirée van der Heijde, Robert Landewé, Maxime Dougados, Joachim Sieper, Anna Molto, Sofia Ramiro","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess construct validity, including known-group discrimination, of the currently available disease activity instruments assessing peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis (SpA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this analysis from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-PerSpA study, patients with a diagnosis of axial SpA, peripheral SpA, or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included. The disease activity instruments evaluated were the Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score, Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Tender Joint Count, Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28, DAS44, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Construct validity was assessed through correlations with external constructs (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, ASAS Health Index, and Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) and known-group discrimination (active/inactive disease based on a combination of PGA [≥5/<5]), and SJC (≥1/0 and ≥2/<2) was analysed using standardised mean differences (SMDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4121 patients were included (mean age 45 [SD, 14] years, 61% males). When assessing the construct validity through correlations with external constructs, all instruments performed excellently (100% hypotheses confirmed). When assessing known-group discrimination, all disease activity measures, except CRP, presented SMDs ≥ 0.8 (good discrimination), with higher SMDs observed for DAS28 followed by DAPSA. Results were similar across disease phenotypes. Considering all combinations of PGA and SJC to discriminate between active/inactive disease, a better performance was observed for the composite scores, including joint counts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our construct validity analysis, all disease activity instruments assessing peripheral arthritis had a good performance as reflected in the correlations with external constructs and the known-group discrimination. The highest discriminatory capacity to distinguish between 'active/inactive disease' was observed for composite scores, including joint counts, like DAS28 and DAPSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess construct validity, including known-group discrimination, of the currently available disease activity instruments assessing peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Methods: In this analysis from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-PerSpA study, patients with a diagnosis of axial SpA, peripheral SpA, or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included. The disease activity instruments evaluated were the Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score, Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Tender Joint Count, Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28, DAS44, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Construct validity was assessed through correlations with external constructs (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, ASAS Health Index, and Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) and known-group discrimination (active/inactive disease based on a combination of PGA [≥5/<5]), and SJC (≥1/0 and ≥2/<2) was analysed using standardised mean differences (SMDs).

Results: In total, 4121 patients were included (mean age 45 [SD, 14] years, 61% males). When assessing the construct validity through correlations with external constructs, all instruments performed excellently (100% hypotheses confirmed). When assessing known-group discrimination, all disease activity measures, except CRP, presented SMDs ≥ 0.8 (good discrimination), with higher SMDs observed for DAS28 followed by DAPSA. Results were similar across disease phenotypes. Considering all combinations of PGA and SJC to discriminate between active/inactive disease, a better performance was observed for the composite scores, including joint counts.

Conclusions: In our construct validity analysis, all disease activity instruments assessing peripheral arthritis had a good performance as reflected in the correlations with external constructs and the known-group discrimination. The highest discriminatory capacity to distinguish between 'active/inactive disease' was observed for composite scores, including joint counts, like DAS28 and DAPSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的评估目前可用的评估脊柱关节炎(SpA)外周关节炎的疾病活动度工具的结构效度,包括已知组别区分度:在这项来自国际脊柱关节炎协会(ASAS)-PerSpA 评估研究的分析中,纳入了诊断为轴向脊柱关节炎、外周脊柱关节炎或银屑病关节炎(PsA)的患者。所评估的疾病活动性工具包括患者全面评估(PGA)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动性指数、轴性脊柱关节炎疾病活动性评分、PsA 疾病活动性指数(DAPSA)、关节肿胀计数(SJC)、关节触痛计数、疾病活动性评分(DAS)28、DAS44 和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。结构效度通过与外部结构(巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数、ASAS健康指数和欧洲生活质量5维度)的相关性和已知组别区分(基于PGA[≥5/结果]组合的活动性/非活动性疾病)进行评估:共纳入 4121 名患者(平均年龄 45 [SD, 14] 岁,61% 为男性)。通过与外部建构相关性评估建构效度时,所有工具均表现优异(100%的假设得到证实)。在评估已知组别区分度时,除 CRP 外,所有疾病活动度测量的 SMD 均≥ 0.8(良好区分度),DAS28 的 SMD 较高,其次是 DAPSA。不同疾病表型的结果相似。考虑到 PGA 和 SJC 的所有组合都能区分活动性/非活动性疾病,综合评分(包括关节计数)的表现更好:在我们的结构效度分析中,所有评估外周关节炎的疾病活动度工具都有很好的表现,这反映在与外部结构的相关性和已知组的区分度上。在区分 "活动性/非活动性疾病 "方面,DAS28 和 DAPSA 等综合评分(包括关节计数)的鉴别能力最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
期刊最新文献
The role of multicriteria decision analysis in the development of candidate classification criteria for antisynthetase syndrome: analysis from the CLASS project. Evaluation of instruments assessing peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis: an analysis of the ASAS-PerSpA study. Obesity substantially impacts rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: time to act. The IL-6 axis in vascular inflammation: effects of IL-6 receptor blockade on vascular lesions from patients with giant-cell arteritis. Statistical review: frequently given comments updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1