Current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer among board-certified hospitals by the Japan Esophageal Society.
{"title":"Current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer among board-certified hospitals by the Japan Esophageal Society.","authors":"Tsuyoshi Harada, Tetsuya Tsuji, Takuya Fukushima, Nobuko Konishi, Hiroki Nakajima, Katsuyoshi Suzuki, Tomohiro Ikeda, Shusuke Toyama, Keiji Matsumori, Takumi Yanagisawa, Kakeru Hashimoto, Hitoshi Kagaya, Sadamoto Zenda, Takashi Kojima, Takeo Fujita, Junya Ueno, Nanako Hijikata, Aiko Ishikawa, Ryuichi Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation has been shown to prevent postoperative pneumonia and physical function decline after esophagectomy in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, the implementation status of prehabilitation for esophagectomy remains unknown. This nationwide survey was performed to investigate the current status of and barriers to prehabilitation before esophagectomy among Japanese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter nationwide survey was performed using the postal mail method. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified as Authorized Institutes for Board-Certified Esophageal Surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society within the past 10 years. We administered the original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy, excluding neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). The number of facilities providing prehabilitation for esophagectomy was 77 (66%), including prehabilitation in the preoperative outpatient setting in 39 (33%) and in the preoperative inpatient setting in 53 (45%). Among the facilities that did not provide prehabilitation, the most common reasons for not providing prehabilitation (i.e., responses of \"agree\" and \"strongly agree\" on questionnaire) were a lack of human resources, preoperative period too short to provide prehabilitation, difficultly using reimbursed medical fees, and no establishment of a standard prehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We elucidated the current implementation status of prehabilitation, identified the critical gap between evidence and practice. This information will contribute to building an effective medical system and framework of prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan and other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prehabilitation has been shown to prevent postoperative pneumonia and physical function decline after esophagectomy in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, the implementation status of prehabilitation for esophagectomy remains unknown. This nationwide survey was performed to investigate the current status of and barriers to prehabilitation before esophagectomy among Japanese hospitals.
Methods: This multicenter nationwide survey was performed using the postal mail method. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified as Authorized Institutes for Board-Certified Esophageal Surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society within the past 10 years. We administered the original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy, excluding neoadjuvant therapy.
Results: The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). The number of facilities providing prehabilitation for esophagectomy was 77 (66%), including prehabilitation in the preoperative outpatient setting in 39 (33%) and in the preoperative inpatient setting in 53 (45%). Among the facilities that did not provide prehabilitation, the most common reasons for not providing prehabilitation (i.e., responses of "agree" and "strongly agree" on questionnaire) were a lack of human resources, preoperative period too short to provide prehabilitation, difficultly using reimbursed medical fees, and no establishment of a standard prehabilitation program.
Conclusions: We elucidated the current implementation status of prehabilitation, identified the critical gap between evidence and practice. This information will contribute to building an effective medical system and framework of prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan and other countries.
期刊介绍:
Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.