Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.2196/68549
Julian Schwarz, Eva Meier-Diedrich, Matthé Scholten, Lucy Stephenson, John Torous, Florian Wurster, Charlotte Blease
{"title":"Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.","authors":"Julian Schwarz, Eva Meier-Diedrich, Matthé Scholten, Lucy Stephenson, John Torous, Florian Wurster, Charlotte Blease","doi":"10.2196/68549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychiatric advance directives (PAD), also known as advance statements or advance choice documents, are legal documents that enable people with mental health conditions to specify their treatment preferences in advance for possible future crises. Subtypes of PADs include crisis cards, joint crisis plans, and self-binding directives (also known as Ulysses contracts). These instruments are intended to improve service user involvement and need orientation in the care of mental crises and to avoid traumatization through unwanted treatment. The existing evidence suggests that people who complete a PAD tend to work more cooperatively with their clinician and experience fewer involuntary hospital admissions. Nevertheless, PADs have not been successfully mainstreamed into care due to multiple barriers to the implementation of PADs, mainly around the completion of PADs and their accessibility and use in crises. The reasons for this include the lack of support in the completion process and acceptance problems, especially on the part of professionals. The research to date primarily recommends support for service users from facilitators, such as peer support workers, and training for all stakeholders. In this article, we argue that while these approaches can help to solve completion and acceptance challenges, they are not sufficient to ensure access to PADs in crises. To ensure accessibility, we propose digital PADs, which offer considerable potential for overcoming these aforementioned barriers. Embedded in national health data infrastructures, PADs could be completed and accessed by service users themselves, possibly with the support of facilitators, and retrieved by any clinic in an emergency. We highlight the strengths and limitations of digital PADs and point out that the proposed solutions must be developed collaboratively and take into account digital inequalities to be effective support for people with serious mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e68549"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychiatric advance directives (PAD), also known as advance statements or advance choice documents, are legal documents that enable people with mental health conditions to specify their treatment preferences in advance for possible future crises. Subtypes of PADs include crisis cards, joint crisis plans, and self-binding directives (also known as Ulysses contracts). These instruments are intended to improve service user involvement and need orientation in the care of mental crises and to avoid traumatization through unwanted treatment. The existing evidence suggests that people who complete a PAD tend to work more cooperatively with their clinician and experience fewer involuntary hospital admissions. Nevertheless, PADs have not been successfully mainstreamed into care due to multiple barriers to the implementation of PADs, mainly around the completion of PADs and their accessibility and use in crises. The reasons for this include the lack of support in the completion process and acceptance problems, especially on the part of professionals. The research to date primarily recommends support for service users from facilitators, such as peer support workers, and training for all stakeholders. In this article, we argue that while these approaches can help to solve completion and acceptance challenges, they are not sufficient to ensure access to PADs in crises. To ensure accessibility, we propose digital PADs, which offer considerable potential for overcoming these aforementioned barriers. Embedded in national health data infrastructures, PADs could be completed and accessed by service users themselves, possibly with the support of facilitators, and retrieved by any clinic in an emergency. We highlight the strengths and limitations of digital PADs and point out that the proposed solutions must be developed collaboratively and take into account digital inequalities to be effective support for people with serious mental health conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合精神科预先指示进入患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索的承诺和限制。
精神病学预先指示(PAD),也被称为预先声明或预先选择文件,是一种法律文件,使有精神健康状况的人能够提前指定他们的治疗偏好,以应对未来可能出现的危机。pad的子类型包括危机卡、联合危机计划和自绑定指令(也称为尤利西斯合同)。这些文书的目的是提高服务使用者对精神危机护理的参与和需求导向,并避免因不必要的治疗而造成创伤。现有的证据表明,完成PAD的人倾向于与他们的临床医生更合作,经历更少的非自愿住院。然而,由于实施PADs的多重障碍,主要围绕着PADs的完成及其在危机中的可及性和使用,PADs尚未成功地纳入保健主流。造成这种情况的原因包括在完成过程中缺乏支持和验收问题,特别是专业人员的问题。迄今为止的研究主要建议由辅导员(如同伴支持工作者)为服务使用者提供支持,并为所有利益攸关方提供培训。在本文中,我们认为,虽然这些方法可以帮助解决完成和验收挑战,但它们不足以确保在危机中获得pad。为了确保可访问性,我们提出了数字pad,它提供了克服上述障碍的巨大潜力。pad嵌在国家卫生数据基础设施中,可由服务使用者自己完成和访问,可能在调解人的支持下,并可由任何诊所在紧急情况下检索。我们强调数字pad的优势和局限性,并指出,拟议的解决办法必须协同制定,并考虑到数字不平等现象,以便为患有严重精神健康问题的人提供有效支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Emotional Content in Text Responses From Physicians and AI Chatbots to Patient Health Queries: Cross-Sectional Study. Correction: Ingroup Favoritism Surrounding COVID-19 Vaccinations in the Hispanic Communities: Experimental Study. Psychosis Risk and Generative Artificial Intelligence Use Frequency, Motivations, and Delusion-Like Experiences: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. AI Triage in Primary Care: Building Safer and More Equitable Real-World Evidence. Implementation of Reference Framework for Preventive Care for Older Adults: Cross-sectional Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1