Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward standardization.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of clinical lipidology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.010
Alicia N Lyle, Elias N Flores, Clark C Coffman, Alex H Doty, Otoe Sugahara, Florian Kronenberg, L Renee Ruhaak, Christa M Cobbaert, Hubert W Vesper
{"title":"Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward standardization.","authors":"Alicia N Lyle, Elias N Flores, Clark C Coffman, Alex H Doty, Otoe Sugahara, Florian Kronenberg, L Renee Ruhaak, Christa M Cobbaert, Hubert W Vesper","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent clinical guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a); however, the lack of Lp(a) assay standardization presents challenges to using common clinical decision points. Assay standardization may minimize inter-assay variability. This improves consistency in CVD risk assessment and evaluations of Lp(a) therapeutic efficacy. Genetically determined size variations in the defining apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein contribute to inter-individual Lp(a) heterogeneity. Individuals who express 2 apo(a) isoforms have 2 sizes of apo(a) in circulation, further contributing to Lp(a) heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC CSP) recently launched an Lp(a) standardization program based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry endorsed liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (RMP). As part of this program, CDC CSP conducted an interlaboratory comparison study to evaluate current Lp(a) inter-assay variability and to investigate potential factors contributing to measurement variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight clinical laboratories measured Lp(a) in 40 individual donor serum samples and 3 serum pools. Serum samples were immunophenotyped by Western blot analysis to determine Lp(a) isoform sizes. Sample concentrations were measured in duplicate over 2 independent runs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assay-specific Lp(a) measurements demonstrated good linear correlation with the RMP. Lp(a) inter-assay measurement variations ranged from 3.3% to 69.1% across individual samples; however, Lp(a) inter-assay coefficients of variation did not increase in a concentration-dependent manner and were not correlated with Lp(a) isoform sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new insights into Lp(a) inter-assay variability and assay performance in clinical laboratories that will guide future standardization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent clinical guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a); however, the lack of Lp(a) assay standardization presents challenges to using common clinical decision points. Assay standardization may minimize inter-assay variability. This improves consistency in CVD risk assessment and evaluations of Lp(a) therapeutic efficacy. Genetically determined size variations in the defining apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein contribute to inter-individual Lp(a) heterogeneity. Individuals who express 2 apo(a) isoforms have 2 sizes of apo(a) in circulation, further contributing to Lp(a) heterogeneity.

Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC CSP) recently launched an Lp(a) standardization program based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry endorsed liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (RMP). As part of this program, CDC CSP conducted an interlaboratory comparison study to evaluate current Lp(a) inter-assay variability and to investigate potential factors contributing to measurement variability.

Methods: Eight clinical laboratories measured Lp(a) in 40 individual donor serum samples and 3 serum pools. Serum samples were immunophenotyped by Western blot analysis to determine Lp(a) isoform sizes. Sample concentrations were measured in duplicate over 2 independent runs.

Results: Assay-specific Lp(a) measurements demonstrated good linear correlation with the RMP. Lp(a) inter-assay measurement variations ranged from 3.3% to 69.1% across individual samples; however, Lp(a) inter-assay coefficients of variation did not increase in a concentration-dependent manner and were not correlated with Lp(a) isoform sizes.

Conclusion: This study provides new insights into Lp(a) inter-assay variability and assay performance in clinical laboratories that will guide future standardization efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Improving cholesterol management in high-risk primary prevention patients: An evidence-based case series. Remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Korean adults. High burden of disease in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia despite recent advances in therapies and updated guidelines: A real-world study. Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward standardization. Association of lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1