Characterizing the diversity of the multiple sclerosis population in Canada: A scoping review.

IF 2.3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552173251321814
Ruth Ann Marrie, Afolasade Fakolade, Janice Linton, Colleen J Maxwell, Dalia Rotstein, Brayden Schindell, Helen Tremlett, Ann Yeh, Marcia Finlayson
{"title":"Characterizing the diversity of the multiple sclerosis population in Canada: A scoping review.","authors":"Ruth Ann Marrie, Afolasade Fakolade, Janice Linton, Colleen J Maxwell, Dalia Rotstein, Brayden Schindell, Helen Tremlett, Ann Yeh, Marcia Finlayson","doi":"10.1177/20552173251321814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify existing information and gaps in knowledge regarding the diversity characteristics of the multiple sclerosis (MS) population in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SCOPUS and ProQuest's global dataset of theses and dissertations from 2010 to January 12, 2024. Data sources were case reports/series, cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, randomized clinical trials, qualitative, mixed methods, participatory studies and systematic reviews conducted in Canada, published in English or French, that included participants with clinically isolated syndrome or MS. Sample characteristics were extracted applying Cochrane's PROGRESS-Plus framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 259 studies, most often studying disease-modifying therapy (24.3%) and access to care (20.9%). Among primary data collection studies 40% used one recruitment strategy, usually MS Clinics and MS Canada. Age (92.7%) and sex (86.9%) were reported most often, ≤10% of studies reported race or ethnicity; religion, sexual orientation and language were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We lack an understanding of characteristics of people living with MS in Canada relevant to health equity. Existing research has been insufficiently inclusive. Better reporting of diversity characteristics is needed, along with specific efforts to recruit and retain more diverse samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"11 1","pages":"20552173251321814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173251321814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This scoping review aimed to identify existing information and gaps in knowledge regarding the diversity characteristics of the multiple sclerosis (MS) population in Canada.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SCOPUS and ProQuest's global dataset of theses and dissertations from 2010 to January 12, 2024. Data sources were case reports/series, cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, randomized clinical trials, qualitative, mixed methods, participatory studies and systematic reviews conducted in Canada, published in English or French, that included participants with clinically isolated syndrome or MS. Sample characteristics were extracted applying Cochrane's PROGRESS-Plus framework.

Results: We included 259 studies, most often studying disease-modifying therapy (24.3%) and access to care (20.9%). Among primary data collection studies 40% used one recruitment strategy, usually MS Clinics and MS Canada. Age (92.7%) and sex (86.9%) were reported most often, ≤10% of studies reported race or ethnicity; religion, sexual orientation and language were not reported.

Conclusions: We lack an understanding of characteristics of people living with MS in Canada relevant to health equity. Existing research has been insufficiently inclusive. Better reporting of diversity characteristics is needed, along with specific efforts to recruit and retain more diverse samples.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大多发性硬化症人群的多样性特征:一项范围综述。
背景:本综述旨在确定加拿大多发性硬化症(MS)人群多样性特征的现有信息和知识缺口。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、chinese journal of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、SCOPUS和ProQuest全球2010年至2024年1月12日的论文数据集。数据来源为在加拿大进行的病例报告/系列、队列研究、病例对照研究、分析性横断面研究、随机临床试验、定性、混合方法、参与性研究和系统评价,均以英语或法语发表,纳入临床孤立综合征或ms患者,应用Cochrane PROGRESS-Plus框架提取样本特征。结果:我们纳入了259项研究,最常见的是研究改善疾病治疗(24.3%)和获得护理(20.9%)。在原始数据收集研究中,40%的研究采用一种招聘策略,通常是MS Clinics和MS Canada。最常报告的是年龄(92.7%)和性别(86.9%),≤10%的研究报告了种族或民族;宗教、性取向和语言没有被报道。结论:我们对加拿大多发性硬化症患者与健康公平相关的特征缺乏了解。现有研究的包容性不够。需要更好地报告多样性特征,同时作出具体努力,招募和保留更多不同的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Status for and associations between disability, employment, barriers for work and health-related quality of life in individuals with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study. Comparative analysis of lung function in supine and sitting positions in patients with moderate multiple sclerosis. Closing the referral gap: The role of a quality improvement initiative to enhance pelvic health physical therapy referrals for persons with multiple sclerosis-related bladder symptoms. Large language models as clinical decision-support tools in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A comparative study of ChatGPT-4o and neurologists. Tumefactive demyelination in older adults: A scoping review of published cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1