Artificial Intelligence in Facial Palsy Treatment: A Systematic Review and Recommendations.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012105
Seraina L C Müller, Pablo Pfister, Nadia Menzi, Laurent Muller, Holger J Klein, Riccardo Schweizer, Z-Hye Lee, Branislav Kollar, Steffen U Eisenhardt, Dirk J Schaefer, Tarek Ismail
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Facial Palsy Treatment: A Systematic Review and Recommendations.","authors":"Seraina L C Müller, Pablo Pfister, Nadia Menzi, Laurent Muller, Holger J Klein, Riccardo Schweizer, Z-Hye Lee, Branislav Kollar, Steffen U Eisenhardt, Dirk J Schaefer, Tarek Ismail","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing and increasingly applied in facial palsy research. However, there is no comprehensive review to guide surgeons on AI-based facial assessment tools. While photographic standards exist, videographic standards for emotions have not been proposed. Implementing these standards is essential for improving information exchange and data comparison with the new AI tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, by analyzing databases including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Our focus was on the use of AI-based facial assessment tools in patients with facial palsy who subsequently received intervention or surgery for their facial palsy. Data were evaluated descriptively, and recommendations, including videographic standards, were developed in collaboration with experts from multiple centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3,222 articles, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Five AI applications analyzed static, dynamic, and chemodenervation procedures in unilateral or bilateral facial palsy. These focused on specific facial landmarks or emotion recognition from photos and videos, but varied in the expressions and emotions analyzed. Five studies provided validation data with either healthy subjects or other outcome measurements. We recommend a minimum videographic assessment including the validated emotions neutral and happy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-related publications on facial palsy have significantly increased, but no consensus exists on the optimal AI-assessment software. The proposed flowchart from our systematic review can guide clinicians in decision-making. We recommend using the proposed videographic emotions to improve study consistency and comparability, while also encouraging further validation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing and increasingly applied in facial palsy research. However, there is no comprehensive review to guide surgeons on AI-based facial assessment tools. While photographic standards exist, videographic standards for emotions have not been proposed. Implementing these standards is essential for improving information exchange and data comparison with the new AI tools.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, by analyzing databases including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Our focus was on the use of AI-based facial assessment tools in patients with facial palsy who subsequently received intervention or surgery for their facial palsy. Data were evaluated descriptively, and recommendations, including videographic standards, were developed in collaboration with experts from multiple centers.

Results: We identified 3,222 articles, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Five AI applications analyzed static, dynamic, and chemodenervation procedures in unilateral or bilateral facial palsy. These focused on specific facial landmarks or emotion recognition from photos and videos, but varied in the expressions and emotions analyzed. Five studies provided validation data with either healthy subjects or other outcome measurements. We recommend a minimum videographic assessment including the validated emotions neutral and happy.

Conclusion: AI-related publications on facial palsy have significantly increased, but no consensus exists on the optimal AI-assessment software. The proposed flowchart from our systematic review can guide clinicians in decision-making. We recommend using the proposed videographic emotions to improve study consistency and comparability, while also encouraging further validation studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
"Over 10 years follow-up experience after inverted T superior pedicle breast reduction with modified Ribeiro flap". "Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography for Safer Filler Injections in Lying Ear Corrections: Identifying Key Vascular Structures". Artificial Intelligence in Facial Palsy Treatment: A Systematic Review and Recommendations. Facial Reanimation in Complete Moebius Syndrome Using Bilateral Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer: A Comparison of One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Procedures. Prophylactic Drain Use in Breast Expander-to-Implant Exchange: Necessity or Nuisance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1