{"title":"Performance of electrochemical aptasensor as antigen test in clinical samples for early diagnosis of leptospirosis.","authors":"Uraiwan Kositanont, Benchaporn Lertanantawong, Kanitha Patarakul, Sirinapa Sripinitchai, Charin Thawornkuno, Thanyarat Chaibun, Chahya Kreangkaiwal, Wassa Waiwinya, Chamras Promptmas, Chatchawan Srisawat","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92685-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of leptospirosis is critical for timely treatment and effective disease management. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel electrochemical aptasensor targeting the electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta (EtfB) of Leptospira interrogans in clinical samples collected during the acute phase of leptospirosis. The aptasensor assay was tested using plasma samples and compared to the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the standard reference method. To assess diagnostic performance, aptasensor results were evaluated against leptospirosis status as determined by MAT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a 40% decrease in electrochemical signal relative to the blank as the optimal cut-off, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. For diagnostic concordance, aptasensor results were compared with those obtained from the reference quantitative PCR (qPCR) method. The aptasensor exhibited 100% positive agreement and 57.1% negative agreement with qPCR. Notably, in patients with high MAT titers, the aptasensor outperformed qPCR in detection rates (100% vs. 25%). These findings indicate that the aptasensor assay is a highly reliable and effective antigen-based diagnostic tool for early leptospirosis detection, making it suitable for both low- and high-prevalence settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92685-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early diagnosis of leptospirosis is critical for timely treatment and effective disease management. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel electrochemical aptasensor targeting the electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta (EtfB) of Leptospira interrogans in clinical samples collected during the acute phase of leptospirosis. The aptasensor assay was tested using plasma samples and compared to the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the standard reference method. To assess diagnostic performance, aptasensor results were evaluated against leptospirosis status as determined by MAT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a 40% decrease in electrochemical signal relative to the blank as the optimal cut-off, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. For diagnostic concordance, aptasensor results were compared with those obtained from the reference quantitative PCR (qPCR) method. The aptasensor exhibited 100% positive agreement and 57.1% negative agreement with qPCR. Notably, in patients with high MAT titers, the aptasensor outperformed qPCR in detection rates (100% vs. 25%). These findings indicate that the aptasensor assay is a highly reliable and effective antigen-based diagnostic tool for early leptospirosis detection, making it suitable for both low- and high-prevalence settings.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.