{"title":"Clinical leadership development in the NHS - a study in urgent and emergency care (UEC).","authors":"Hein Scheffer","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper explores why clinicians in an emergency department (ED) become leaders, their experiences of leadership and their future developmental needs. It focuses on emerging leaders, middle management, and senior management whilst addressing the knowledge gap in identifying the training needs of clinical leadership in urgent and emergency care (UEC).</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This study utilised both surveys (<i>n</i> = 36) and semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 12). Qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, whilst qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach, drawing on a conceptual framework based on the inter-related concepts of culture, professional identity and leadership development. This paper focuses on the third concept and offers insights into the journey and challenges faced in making the transition from clinician to leader.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The findings revealed that most clinical leaders received insufficient training to prepare them to be leaders in UEC.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>This study was originally intended for a single English Acute Trust, rendering the data limiting, as an interpretivist study. The fact that three Trusts were used for the semi-structured interviews helped with the triangulation of data.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The paper proposes an original leadership development framework for UEC to support leaders who are often excellent clinicians, to be equally brilliant and appropriately empowered leaders.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>A more individual-centric focus on clinical leadership development is advocated, offering an original leadership development framework to support leadership development and contributing to the wider literature on education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":"39 9","pages":"192-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This paper explores why clinicians in an emergency department (ED) become leaders, their experiences of leadership and their future developmental needs. It focuses on emerging leaders, middle management, and senior management whilst addressing the knowledge gap in identifying the training needs of clinical leadership in urgent and emergency care (UEC).
Design/methodology/approach: This study utilised both surveys (n = 36) and semi-structured interviews (n = 12). Qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, whilst qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach, drawing on a conceptual framework based on the inter-related concepts of culture, professional identity and leadership development. This paper focuses on the third concept and offers insights into the journey and challenges faced in making the transition from clinician to leader.
Findings: The findings revealed that most clinical leaders received insufficient training to prepare them to be leaders in UEC.
Research limitations/implications: This study was originally intended for a single English Acute Trust, rendering the data limiting, as an interpretivist study. The fact that three Trusts were used for the semi-structured interviews helped with the triangulation of data.
Practical implications: The paper proposes an original leadership development framework for UEC to support leaders who are often excellent clinicians, to be equally brilliant and appropriately empowered leaders.
Originality/value: A more individual-centric focus on clinical leadership development is advocated, offering an original leadership development framework to support leadership development and contributing to the wider literature on education.
期刊介绍:
■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.