A Randomized Trial of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2415948
Yogish C Kudva, Dan Raghinaru, John W Lum, Timothy E Graham, David Liljenquist, Elias K Spanakis, Francisco J Pasquel, Andrew Ahmann, David T Ahn, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Davida Kruger, Sue A Brown, Carol J Levy, Ruth S Weinstock, Devin W Steenkamp, Tamara Spaic, Irl B Hirsch, Frances Broyles, Michael R Rickels, Michael A Tsoukas, Philip Raskin, Betul Hatipoglu, Donna Desjardins, Adrienne N Terry, Lakshmi G Singh, Georgia M Davis, Caleb Schmid, Jelena Kravarusic, Kasey Coyne, Luis Casaubon, Valerie Espinosa, Jaye K Jones, Kathleen Estrada, Samina Afreen, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selina L Liu, Sheryl Marks, Amy J Peleckis, Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Vanessa Tardio, Corey Kurek, Ryan D Luker, Jade Churchill, Farbod Z Tajrishi, Ariel Dean, Brittany Dennis, Evelyn Fronczyk, Jennifer Perez, Shereen Mukhashen, Jasmeen Dhillon, Aslihan Ipek, Suzan Bzdick, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Marsha Driscoll, Xenia Averkiou, Cornelia V Dalton-Bakes, Adelyn Moore, Lin F Jordan, Amanda Lesniak, Jordan E Pinsker, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Tiffany Campos, Charles Spanbauer, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Yogish C Kudva, Dan Raghinaru, John W Lum, Timothy E Graham, David Liljenquist, Elias K Spanakis, Francisco J Pasquel, Andrew Ahmann, David T Ahn, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Davida Kruger, Sue A Brown, Carol J Levy, Ruth S Weinstock, Devin W Steenkamp, Tamara Spaic, Irl B Hirsch, Frances Broyles, Michael R Rickels, Michael A Tsoukas, Philip Raskin, Betul Hatipoglu, Donna Desjardins, Adrienne N Terry, Lakshmi G Singh, Georgia M Davis, Caleb Schmid, Jelena Kravarusic, Kasey Coyne, Luis Casaubon, Valerie Espinosa, Jaye K Jones, Kathleen Estrada, Samina Afreen, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selina L Liu, Sheryl Marks, Amy J Peleckis, Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Vanessa Tardio, Corey Kurek, Ryan D Luker, Jade Churchill, Farbod Z Tajrishi, Ariel Dean, Brittany Dennis, Evelyn Fronczyk, Jennifer Perez, Shereen Mukhashen, Jasmeen Dhillon, Aslihan Ipek, Suzan Bzdick, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Marsha Driscoll, Xenia Averkiou, Cornelia V Dalton-Bakes, Adelyn Moore, Lin F Jordan, Amanda Lesniak, Jordan E Pinsker, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Tiffany Campos, Charles Spanbauer, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2415948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have been shown to be beneficial for patients with type 1 diabetes, but data are needed from randomized, controlled trials regarding their role in the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 13-week, multicenter trial, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive AID or to continue their pretrial insulin-delivery method (control group); both groups received continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 13 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 319 patients underwent randomization. Glycated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.9 percentage points (from 8.2±1.4% at baseline to 7.3±0.9% at week 13) in the AID group and by 0.3 percentage points (from 8.1±1.2% to 7.7±1.1%) in the control group (mean adjusted difference, -0.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to -0.4; P<0.001). The mean percentage of time that patients were in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 48±24% to 64±16% in the AID group and from 51±21% to 52±21% in the control group (mean difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17; P<0.001). All other multiplicity-controlled CGM outcomes reflective of hyperglycemia that were measured were significantly better in the AID group than in the control group. The frequency of CGM-measured hypoglycemia was low in both groups. A severe hypoglycemia event occurred in one patient in the AID group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this 13-week, randomized, controlled trial involving adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, AID was associated with a greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels than CGM alone. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care; 2IQP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05785832.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2415948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have been shown to be beneficial for patients with type 1 diabetes, but data are needed from randomized, controlled trials regarding their role in the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In this 13-week, multicenter trial, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive AID or to continue their pretrial insulin-delivery method (control group); both groups received continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 13 weeks.

Results: A total of 319 patients underwent randomization. Glycated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.9 percentage points (from 8.2±1.4% at baseline to 7.3±0.9% at week 13) in the AID group and by 0.3 percentage points (from 8.1±1.2% to 7.7±1.1%) in the control group (mean adjusted difference, -0.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to -0.4; P<0.001). The mean percentage of time that patients were in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 48±24% to 64±16% in the AID group and from 51±21% to 52±21% in the control group (mean difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17; P<0.001). All other multiplicity-controlled CGM outcomes reflective of hyperglycemia that were measured were significantly better in the AID group than in the control group. The frequency of CGM-measured hypoglycemia was low in both groups. A severe hypoglycemia event occurred in one patient in the AID group.

Conclusions: In this 13-week, randomized, controlled trial involving adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, AID was associated with a greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels than CGM alone. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care; 2IQP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05785832.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Trial of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes. Antibiotic Treatment for 7 versus 14 Days in Patients with Bloodstream Infections. Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer - Primary Results of the INSEMA Trial. Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer - Is It Obsolete?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1